Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the vast majority of residents? but the vast majority of respondents. Two very different things, yet some struggle to tell the difference.


Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other Labour

> Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported pushing

> through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported by the

> vast majority of residents, yet the attitude of

> one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk since

> the start and now to pass the buck is a typical

> politicians response when they're in power.

Good idea - unfortunately it?s got the stage where no matter what a councillor says some will twist it and interpret it in a way to suit their agenda. Cllr Leeming was helpfully informing people of the Thames Water works, he?s right it probably will be quicker to walk or cycle if you can possibly avoid driving. That?s true of most travel in London.



jazzer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps bring this back to the topic, rather than

> go of at various unconnected tangent's.

>

> If you want to talk about cllrs/MP, how about

> starting a separate thread.

march46 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the vast

> majority of residents? but the vast majority of

> respondents. Two very different things, yet some

> struggle to tell the difference.

>

> Bic Basher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other

> Labour

> > Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported pushing

> > through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported by

> the

> > vast majority of residents, yet the attitude of

> > one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk

> since

> > the start and now to pass the buck is a typical

> > politicians response when they're in power.


It's easy to spot a pro LTN person on EDF.

march46 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good idea - unfortunately it?s got the stage where

> no matter what a councillor says some will twist

> it and interpret it in a way to suit their agenda.

> Cllr Leeming was helpfully informing people of the

> Thames Water works, he?s right it probably will be

> quicker to walk or cycle if you can possibly avoid

> driving. That?s true of most travel in London.

>

>

> jazzer Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Perhaps bring this back to the topic, rather

> than

> > go of at various unconnected tangent's.

> >

> > If you want to talk about cllrs/MP, how about

> > starting a separate thread.



To be fair I think a lot of people take offence to his tone and his, sometimes, pointed and demeaning tweets.


I am not sure what value adding the comment below brings to his thread, other than trying to have a dig:


Remember, this is the responsibility of Thames Water not the council


Either that or he is really worried about losing his seat and feels the need to spell it out to people! Pretty sure most people realize the water main has nothing to do with the council!

These threads can get abit personal at times??

Every now & again I take a peak but can?t be asked comment 🤨


London is a city for gods sake??. You will never get country roads/lanes down here!

All these LTN?s are helping nobody other than the councils/government fill their pockets!

If you mistakenly think for a second the government care about you, then I suggest you think again!


LTN supporters can support them all day long, all these past, present & future charges they are talking about are affecting the consumer?? the bottom line is everything is about clawing money from us for whatever they wish to use it for, we will always be worse off no matter how climate friendly you are!


Yes I know my post isn?t about the south circular, I?m sorry, but I just wanted to say something

Btw, I?m a driver & drive for a living but do not own a car simply because I don?t need one.

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> march46 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the vast

> > majority of residents? but the vast majority of

> > respondents. Two very different things, yet

> some

> > struggle to tell the difference.

> >

> > Bic Basher Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other

> > Labour

> > > Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported

> pushing

> > > through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported by

> > the

> > > vast majority of residents, yet the attitude

> of

> > > one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk

> > since

> > > the start and now to pass the buck is a

> typical

> > > politicians response when they're in power.

>

> It's easy to spot a pro LTN person on EDF.


Interesting that you identified someone as pro-LDN because they had their facts straight. 🤔

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bic Basher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > march46 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the

> vast

> > > majority of residents? but the vast majority

> of

> > > respondents. Two very different things, yet

> > some

> > > struggle to tell the difference.

> > >

> > > Bic Basher Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other

> > > Labour

> > > > Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported

> > pushing

> > > > through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported

> by

> > > the

> > > > vast majority of residents, yet the

> attitude

> > of

> > > > one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk

> > > since

> > > > the start and now to pass the buck is a

> > typical

> > > > politicians response when they're in power.

> >

> > It's easy to spot a pro LTN person on EDF.

>

> Interesting that you identified someone as pro-LDN

> because they had their facts straight. 🤔



Another LTN troll.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • For these places to be good they have to be mega efficient: high volume high speed like the one in Camberwell next to Stormbird.  If you can't hit that sort of tipping point you end up having to cut corners and you enter a sort of death spiral.  The one at the south end of Lordship Lane near Joseph's is fairly hopeless.
    • It's my understanding that estate agents are obliged to put forward any offer to the seller made to them by the buyer. The decision to accept us up to the seller.  If you're in a chain and someone in the chain has the brass neck to threaten to pull out at the last minute unless you take their lower offer, you're in a very tricky position and the gazunderer knows that.  It's a really nasty thing to do but a crappy person will do it to save money.  That's why if you can be at the top of a chain by going into rented or some other temporary solution you're in a much stronger position to tell the gazunderer to take a running jump which is very satisfying.
    • Isn't it because any bladed item now needs to sold with a new set of legal conditions (age verification etc) which this forum doesn't have? Even if there's a tool to remove stones from a horses hoof, and a tiny pair of tweezers its still got a blade.
    • Yes, if you think they have been complicit in this. When you say you "had to" accept the lower price from your buyer, was that because of the timing of your purchase?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...