Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was saying, that coming on to publicly note that you heard something that someone had said to someone else isn't the most reliable indicator of what was said.


This thread has been an absolute experiment in misinformation. From the ill informed initial poster through to your 'he said, she said' interpretation of someone's recollection.


Melbourne Grove isn't decimated - I know for those of you who want the road reopening, it would be helpful to present this to back up your perception, but there is no basis in fact.


[Edited to deal with Heartblock's concerns on phrasing - don't want anything detracting from the very real concerns about the misinformation spreading attempts they're making!]

It's not misinformation, it's fact that three shops have closed in Melborne grove.What happens next to those shops we can wait and see.

You seem to have launched a campaign to discredit my honest observation and concern.

I await your unnecessary response to attempt to discredit anybody who dares to speak up against road closures.


goldilocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was saying, that coming on to publicly note that

> you heard something that someone had said to

> someone else isn't the most reliable indicator of

> what was said.

>

> This thread has been an absolute experiment in

> misinformation. From the ill informed initial

> poster through to your 'he said, she said'

> interpretation of someone's recollection.

>

> Melbourne Grove isn't decimated - I know for those

> of you who want the road reopening, it would be

> helpful to present this to back up your

> perception, but there is no basis in fact.

>

>

I still feel the lack of access for emergency vehicles is dangerous. Going up LL takes longer and we can not pretend it doesn't.


I am appalled at the council retracting their decision to open up the other half of Melbourne Grove (by the church) to emergency vehicles.


I appreciate that everyone's opinions are their own, however before the LTN's nobody had purchased/rented houses in cul de sacs so their children could play safely on the streets.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...