Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I?d say you?re liable for congestion charge (you were in the zone during chargeable period), but whether the cameras/system is able to detect your movements and conclude the same is the question.

Would it not be worth trying it to see - pretty cheap for an entire days parking.

And we?d all like to know !

If you drive in outside operational hours and your car is then parked for the duration, there is no charge. Same as the ULEZ - if you have a non-compliant car but it's parked on the street or in your driveway, no charge is payable.


Charge only applies if the vehicle is moving within the hours of operation.


Hope that helps.

exdulwicher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you drive in outside operational hours and your

> car is then parked for the duration, there is no

> charge. Same as the ULEZ - if you have a

> non-compliant car but it's parked on the street or

> in your driveway, no charge is payable.

>

> Charge only applies if the vehicle is moving

> within the hours of operation.

>

> Hope that helps.


Agree with this

I have now heard from TFL that if your car is within the zone and parked on the street, congestion charge is payable even if stationary the entire time.



That's wrong.


TfL website:

https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/lez-lez-services-37309


Extract from the page: The charges only need to be paid if you drive your vehicle within the zone. Parked vehicles are not subject to any charges.


That's the whole issue behind reducing the hours that it is operational, that people will drive in at 6am, park up and then drive out again at 7pm. No charge payable.


The info is on various London tourist websites as well eg https://www.toptiplondon.com/practical-tips/london-congestion-charge

It is only ?10 a year though and it makes it easier if you're not sure in certain circumstances


Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's a bit of a swizz that TfL charges you

> to sign up for Autopay. If it were free, OP could

> have just signed up for that, and if they got

> pinged, they wouldn't have to worry about getting

> fined.

goldilocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is only ?10 a year though and it makes it

> easier if you're not sure in certain

> circumstances

>

> Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think it's a bit of a swizz that TfL charges

> you

> > to sign up for Autopay. If it were free, OP

> could

> > have just signed up for that, and if they got

> > pinged, they wouldn't have to worry about

> getting

> > fined.


This - my 20 year old diesel is liable for the ULEZ - agree in principle with ULEZ and reducing pollution - I've made dozens of short trips inside the ULEZ though and avoided the charge, whilst still paying it when driving it on major roads. ?10 is a cheap insurance policy.

goldilocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is only ?10 a year though and it makes it

> easier if you're not sure in certain

> circumstances

>

> Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think it's a bit of a swizz that TfL charges

> you

> > to sign up for Autopay. If it were free, OP

> could

> > have just signed up for that, and if they got

> > pinged, they wouldn't have to worry about

> getting

> > fined.


This - my 20 year old diesel is liable for the ULEZ - agree in principle with ULEZ and reducing pollution - I've made dozens of short trips inside the ULEZ though and avoided the charge, whilst still paying it when driving it on major roads. ?10 is a cheap insurance policy.

  • 2 weeks later...

trinidad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> if you go over the red large c painted on the road

> between operational times, you need to pay.



Yes but you also need to pay if you drive within the zone during the operational times. It's not only if you enter or exit the zone.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...