Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I?d say you?re liable for congestion charge (you were in the zone during chargeable period), but whether the cameras/system is able to detect your movements and conclude the same is the question.

Would it not be worth trying it to see - pretty cheap for an entire days parking.

And we?d all like to know !

If you drive in outside operational hours and your car is then parked for the duration, there is no charge. Same as the ULEZ - if you have a non-compliant car but it's parked on the street or in your driveway, no charge is payable.


Charge only applies if the vehicle is moving within the hours of operation.


Hope that helps.

exdulwicher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you drive in outside operational hours and your

> car is then parked for the duration, there is no

> charge. Same as the ULEZ - if you have a

> non-compliant car but it's parked on the street or

> in your driveway, no charge is payable.

>

> Charge only applies if the vehicle is moving

> within the hours of operation.

>

> Hope that helps.


Agree with this

I have now heard from TFL that if your car is within the zone and parked on the street, congestion charge is payable even if stationary the entire time.



That's wrong.


TfL website:

https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/lez-lez-services-37309


Extract from the page: The charges only need to be paid if you drive your vehicle within the zone. Parked vehicles are not subject to any charges.


That's the whole issue behind reducing the hours that it is operational, that people will drive in at 6am, park up and then drive out again at 7pm. No charge payable.


The info is on various London tourist websites as well eg https://www.toptiplondon.com/practical-tips/london-congestion-charge

It is only ?10 a year though and it makes it easier if you're not sure in certain circumstances


Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's a bit of a swizz that TfL charges you

> to sign up for Autopay. If it were free, OP could

> have just signed up for that, and if they got

> pinged, they wouldn't have to worry about getting

> fined.

goldilocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is only ?10 a year though and it makes it

> easier if you're not sure in certain

> circumstances

>

> Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think it's a bit of a swizz that TfL charges

> you

> > to sign up for Autopay. If it were free, OP

> could

> > have just signed up for that, and if they got

> > pinged, they wouldn't have to worry about

> getting

> > fined.


This - my 20 year old diesel is liable for the ULEZ - agree in principle with ULEZ and reducing pollution - I've made dozens of short trips inside the ULEZ though and avoided the charge, whilst still paying it when driving it on major roads. ?10 is a cheap insurance policy.

goldilocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is only ?10 a year though and it makes it

> easier if you're not sure in certain

> circumstances

>

> Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think it's a bit of a swizz that TfL charges

> you

> > to sign up for Autopay. If it were free, OP

> could

> > have just signed up for that, and if they got

> > pinged, they wouldn't have to worry about

> getting

> > fined.


This - my 20 year old diesel is liable for the ULEZ - agree in principle with ULEZ and reducing pollution - I've made dozens of short trips inside the ULEZ though and avoided the charge, whilst still paying it when driving it on major roads. ?10 is a cheap insurance policy.

  • 2 weeks later...

trinidad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> if you go over the red large c painted on the road

> between operational times, you need to pay.



Yes but you also need to pay if you drive within the zone during the operational times. It's not only if you enter or exit the zone.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Whatever you think about Trump or Lowe or any other politician is entirely irrelevant to this topic.  You don't need to keep bringing up their politics or how much you hate them because it's just not pertinent to this discussion. 
    • Was the white powder any good?
    • “You are advocating that their failure to be impartial is justified because you disagree politically with the people they are inaccurate about. ” im arguing no such thing.  I saw lowe’s comments misreported by several news sources and then in saw the corrections and apologies roll in.  Correctly  I think you will find everyone gets misreported.  Pretty frequently.    but whereas I think Badenoch is as mad as a box of frogs and a bad leader of Tories or starmer is not up to the job of leading the Labour party  I think they both fit under the “norms” of political life and they tend to run with the punches a bit more  Trump and Lowe are not just people I disagree with.  They are  fundamentally anti-democratic, racist pathetic men who should have no proximity to power - they also should not be misreported.  But they do have thinner skin  (something they share with say, Corbyn) 
    • Has it  been more  of an absolute shambles ever since the council took back management?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...