Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I?d say you?re liable for congestion charge (you were in the zone during chargeable period), but whether the cameras/system is able to detect your movements and conclude the same is the question.

Would it not be worth trying it to see - pretty cheap for an entire days parking.

And we?d all like to know !

If you drive in outside operational hours and your car is then parked for the duration, there is no charge. Same as the ULEZ - if you have a non-compliant car but it's parked on the street or in your driveway, no charge is payable.


Charge only applies if the vehicle is moving within the hours of operation.


Hope that helps.

exdulwicher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you drive in outside operational hours and your

> car is then parked for the duration, there is no

> charge. Same as the ULEZ - if you have a

> non-compliant car but it's parked on the street or

> in your driveway, no charge is payable.

>

> Charge only applies if the vehicle is moving

> within the hours of operation.

>

> Hope that helps.


Agree with this

I have now heard from TFL that if your car is within the zone and parked on the street, congestion charge is payable even if stationary the entire time.



That's wrong.


TfL website:

https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/lez-lez-services-37309


Extract from the page: The charges only need to be paid if you drive your vehicle within the zone. Parked vehicles are not subject to any charges.


That's the whole issue behind reducing the hours that it is operational, that people will drive in at 6am, park up and then drive out again at 7pm. No charge payable.


The info is on various London tourist websites as well eg https://www.toptiplondon.com/practical-tips/london-congestion-charge

It is only ?10 a year though and it makes it easier if you're not sure in certain circumstances


Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's a bit of a swizz that TfL charges you

> to sign up for Autopay. If it were free, OP could

> have just signed up for that, and if they got

> pinged, they wouldn't have to worry about getting

> fined.

goldilocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is only ?10 a year though and it makes it

> easier if you're not sure in certain

> circumstances

>

> Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think it's a bit of a swizz that TfL charges

> you

> > to sign up for Autopay. If it were free, OP

> could

> > have just signed up for that, and if they got

> > pinged, they wouldn't have to worry about

> getting

> > fined.


This - my 20 year old diesel is liable for the ULEZ - agree in principle with ULEZ and reducing pollution - I've made dozens of short trips inside the ULEZ though and avoided the charge, whilst still paying it when driving it on major roads. ?10 is a cheap insurance policy.

goldilocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is only ?10 a year though and it makes it

> easier if you're not sure in certain

> circumstances

>

> Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think it's a bit of a swizz that TfL charges

> you

> > to sign up for Autopay. If it were free, OP

> could

> > have just signed up for that, and if they got

> > pinged, they wouldn't have to worry about

> getting

> > fined.


This - my 20 year old diesel is liable for the ULEZ - agree in principle with ULEZ and reducing pollution - I've made dozens of short trips inside the ULEZ though and avoided the charge, whilst still paying it when driving it on major roads. ?10 is a cheap insurance policy.

  • 2 weeks later...

trinidad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> if you go over the red large c painted on the road

> between operational times, you need to pay.



Yes but you also need to pay if you drive within the zone during the operational times. It's not only if you enter or exit the zone.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
    • I always like Redemptions coffee though I've not visted for awhile..Romeo Jones was always my 1st choice for takeout Coffee Redemption 2nd. What IS with all these independent Yoga and Pilates Studios? Theres one on London Rd in Forest Hill (Mind) thats recently opened and then theres the Pilates place thats opened on North X Road. I looked at the prices of the one on NorthX road and was frankly shocked at how expensive it is, The FH one is slightly less.  Made me decide to stick with classes in The local authority gym
    • Dulwich Village update: The old DVillage location is (again?) under offer. The storefront next to the new grocer is going to open as a yoga and pilates studio...the name of which I've forgotten. 🤦‍♂️  Megan's is starting to push its takeaway coffee and cannibalise some of Redemption Coffee's market share. Is Megan's struggling? It's quite a big restaurant they have and rent cant be cheap. The reinventing of the Megan's branch on Lordship Lane as Ollie's seems to have stalled. And Redemption is looking a bit tired these days...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...