Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Littlejohn stirred the hate, made it necessary for this teacher to have to use a back exit to get in and out of school. pursued by photographers who were after a first photo. The ball started rolling with a local Manchester journalist who took a non-story and catapulted it into the news, digging up a couple of objecting parents who gave their children thoughts they probably didn't have. So I expect Littlejohn, by making what would anyway be a stressful period for the teacher into a nightmare, is partly responsible.

I am so incredibly sad to hear of this woman's death.


There was a very moving interview on radio 4 about the topic of a real marriage, in which one party had a sex change, and the marriage not only survived but became more honest and fulfilling for both partners. That couple live in this area too, and Victoria C posted about it here:


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?27,963747


This news is just terrible. Such a cruel and unfair way to die. And so unnessary. What a waste: to have met all the challenges which being other-gendered from your body must present, and then being hounded into suicide by this kind of idiotic, bigoted, criminal hatred.

I'm a little confused as to why some parents at the school felt that they needed to complain publicly to a newspaper about this transgendered teacher. Surely being transgendered is just another medical condition, like cancer, obesity, heart disease, depression etc? If explained at the appropriate level, I can't see how that's a problem for children.


I can only come to the same conclusion as WM above: bigoted, criminal hatred on the part of the parents. I'm not saying that the school was 100% correct in the way they handled this case. However, surely they were better avenues for parents to deal with it? And possibly the school should have used a little more forethought to account for some parents' prejudiced natures?


Also I agree with Otta. The editor(s) should be shouldering some responsibility here too.

Paul Dacre (DM editor) has to be one of the most appalling people working in journalism. People go on about Murdoch and his henchmen but I actually think Dacre is far far worse. People think they are 'better' cos they read the Mail not the Sun, but they aren't. He is an utter disgrace. You can thank him for Cameron's current waffle on immigration, that's for sure. In fact, if you aren't a white, British, working man, Dacre will park all of society's ills at your door at some point.


My Mil (who is otherwise lovely) is coming this week and this always brings my DM-hate to the fore as she's bound to trot something or other out that's she's read in it. Why??? You're an intelligent woman, stop it! Grrrrrr.

Very said to hear of this woman's death.


Reading through the posts and then reading the last one. I can read the Sun in less than 5 minutes but the Mail takes a lot longer. Does that make me 'better'?


Edited to say I feel sorry for your mother-in-law!

The initial Accrington Observer article is here: http://www.accringtonobserver.co.uk/news/local-news/accrington-schools-letter-parents-tells-1273948


And a copy of Littlejohn's is here: http://web.archive.org/web/20121226073921/http:/www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2251347/Nathan-Uptons-wrong-body--hes-wrong-job.html.


If you go to the page, www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2251347/Nathan-Uptons-wrong-body--hes-wrong-job.html, from which the archive copy was made, you are redirected to another version, from which the relevant article is absent.


At http://www.newstatesman.com/2013/03/press-regulation-freedom-speech-and-death-lucy-meadows is a piece by Jane Fae who has seen some of Lucy Meadows' emails about the behaviour of some of the press.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think the point you're missing is that our local authorities are happy to siphon off the amenities we pay for for commercial gain at the cost of local residents. Both Peckham Rye (and Brockwell Park more so) become partly unusable because of said events and it seems both are ignoring the input of locals who have to live with the disruption/post event damage. And it is not clear where any revenue generated from these events is going to or if they are actually generating any revenue for the council at all. As someone who uses Brockwell Park a lot I can tell you the disruption to that park was awful last year so much of it is closed off. And as Fishboy points out you lament the old free festivals but these are supposed to be being funded by this type of event - but where are they? Dulwich Park festival was massively curtailed this year so how come it's fine for the council to roll over for commercial festivals but community run events are suffering? Do the councils not have their priorities a bit mixed up? Anyway, I have always hated inner-city "festivals". Give me a proper in the wilds of the countryside miles from anywhere festival any day of the week....
    • That's odd, one of the claimed benefits of the Gala money is - "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year" I've asked for a list of these events, as without this I feel it can't realistically be used to justify the disruption. Can anyone name even 10 of these events? 5?
    • There’s an unusual cat in my garden that appears a bit lost and hungry. White and fluffy with grey parts and blue eyes. Seems like a house cat. I’m behind Goose Green off Ondine. 
    • As far as I am aware you have shown no interest in the Gala thread but anything you find to knock a local authority, and no doubt hope that it applies to Southwark LTNs, then off you go. I'd love to hear what you enjoy.  I've been to multiple festivals big and small, in life.  The line up at the Lambeth Show looks good.  Steamdown anyone? It's a balance between many factors, amenity Vs loss of amenity, disruption including noise during the event, damage to the park, income to the local authority during difficult times.  What is your view on these matters, or is it just a case that you smell meat? I cycled in the Massif Central when there was a big creative festival and that smelled of BBQ meat.  Similarly a Portuguese festival at Kensington Park. There are some people round my way who used to complain about the music at the Horniman on a summer Sunday afternoon.  This is not comparable to the disruption due to the Gala, I hasten to add.  But I was stunned at the time thinking how could they have issues with some soul/jazz/afro beat/samba/Latino etc  Shane they don't have the same number of free events any more.  I digress....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...