Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Littlejohn stirred the hate, made it necessary for this teacher to have to use a back exit to get in and out of school. pursued by photographers who were after a first photo. The ball started rolling with a local Manchester journalist who took a non-story and catapulted it into the news, digging up a couple of objecting parents who gave their children thoughts they probably didn't have. So I expect Littlejohn, by making what would anyway be a stressful period for the teacher into a nightmare, is partly responsible.

I am so incredibly sad to hear of this woman's death.


There was a very moving interview on radio 4 about the topic of a real marriage, in which one party had a sex change, and the marriage not only survived but became more honest and fulfilling for both partners. That couple live in this area too, and Victoria C posted about it here:


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?27,963747


This news is just terrible. Such a cruel and unfair way to die. And so unnessary. What a waste: to have met all the challenges which being other-gendered from your body must present, and then being hounded into suicide by this kind of idiotic, bigoted, criminal hatred.

I'm a little confused as to why some parents at the school felt that they needed to complain publicly to a newspaper about this transgendered teacher. Surely being transgendered is just another medical condition, like cancer, obesity, heart disease, depression etc? If explained at the appropriate level, I can't see how that's a problem for children.


I can only come to the same conclusion as WM above: bigoted, criminal hatred on the part of the parents. I'm not saying that the school was 100% correct in the way they handled this case. However, surely they were better avenues for parents to deal with it? And possibly the school should have used a little more forethought to account for some parents' prejudiced natures?


Also I agree with Otta. The editor(s) should be shouldering some responsibility here too.

Paul Dacre (DM editor) has to be one of the most appalling people working in journalism. People go on about Murdoch and his henchmen but I actually think Dacre is far far worse. People think they are 'better' cos they read the Mail not the Sun, but they aren't. He is an utter disgrace. You can thank him for Cameron's current waffle on immigration, that's for sure. In fact, if you aren't a white, British, working man, Dacre will park all of society's ills at your door at some point.


My Mil (who is otherwise lovely) is coming this week and this always brings my DM-hate to the fore as she's bound to trot something or other out that's she's read in it. Why??? You're an intelligent woman, stop it! Grrrrrr.

Very said to hear of this woman's death.


Reading through the posts and then reading the last one. I can read the Sun in less than 5 minutes but the Mail takes a lot longer. Does that make me 'better'?


Edited to say I feel sorry for your mother-in-law!

The initial Accrington Observer article is here: http://www.accringtonobserver.co.uk/news/local-news/accrington-schools-letter-parents-tells-1273948


And a copy of Littlejohn's is here: http://web.archive.org/web/20121226073921/http:/www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2251347/Nathan-Uptons-wrong-body--hes-wrong-job.html.


If you go to the page, www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2251347/Nathan-Uptons-wrong-body--hes-wrong-job.html, from which the archive copy was made, you are redirected to another version, from which the relevant article is absent.


At http://www.newstatesman.com/2013/03/press-regulation-freedom-speech-and-death-lucy-meadows is a piece by Jane Fae who has seen some of Lucy Meadows' emails about the behaviour of some of the press.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • a (clean) nappy/pamper, it was like it had snowed in the garden.  The absorbent stuff inside spread everywhere.  Can I have my gardening gloves back please.
    • They've left all kinds of things in my garden including gardening gloves and shoes, not to mention scavenged food and packaging. Once they left an unopened vacuum pack of smoked trout, the next day some pita bread. All a bit biblical.
    • From memory foxes only became a regular sight in the 90s, the attached article says they first appeared in the 30s becoming far more common in the 80s.  Apparently, whilst we think that urban foxes live longer than rural due to their 'easy' life few will make it over the age of two.  In towns they are far more crowded than their natural habitat where they are more territorial. I've never seen foxes and cats fighting but once saw two cats squaring up to each other and a watching fox went up and butted its head against one of the cats.  There's a video on youtube of a cat and fox facing off when the cat is eating outside, but it wont let me embed on this post.  Get too close and I'll scratch you. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/15/urban-foxes-are-they-fantastic-or-a-growing-menace My main issue is leaving things out like gardening gloves and they go or are shredded.  One stole a bag of bird food in front of me, took it next door, shredded the bag and then left it.  
    • I was trying to remember when Franklins moved to Lordship Lane from Walworth Road where it was combined with an antique/bric a brac shop. Mid 1990s, first wave ED gentrification?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...