Jump to content

Cycle lockers at East Dulwich station (Lounged: cycle security generally)


Recommended Posts

I was just wondering if these are secure and a good thing, as if so have thought of finding out how to get them to put some at Nunhead station.


Recently left my rusty old bike, bought for ?20, with both wheels locked up, and got back late only to find someone had filched the saddle. I would take my bike into town but I just can't carry it up the Nunhead station stairs mountain.

Used to do it daily but that was 15 years, one serious illness and two stones ago.


You are right though it is surprisingly easy to get about by bike, even for me. It's just that I'm not convinced I could hack it back down the Old Kent Road at end of long working day. I think it may be safer for the faster cyclist, not she who takes a while to speed up!

Two groups to talk to about getting cycle lockers installed: London Cycling Campaign and Southwark Cyclists who should be able to point you in the right direction.


We had cycle lockers at my last work place and they're great - but be sure to also lock your bike to the inside of the locker, as one locker was broken into and the bike just taken out.

Ta for advice.


Mr/Ms Asset - I have emailed the locker people and awaiting response. I was wondering tho' as per Pandora comment below, whether any thief/vandal so driven they will steal an old saddle would also try to break into the lockers. Whole area seems to be littered with corpses of broken bicycles still securely locked but with missing wheels/bits.


SteveT - I never thought of that, and now can't work out why didn't occur before. And they say exercise sharpens the brain. Only thing is I would have to source a very thin chain to loop through saddle support as they are quite shallow - do you manage to lock through your saddle and if so can you kindly point to where to get thin enough but still secure chain?


Pandora - thanks for links and steer about security of lockers.

SQ, a quick visit to a decent bike shop will provide you with many security items such as cables for your saddle rails (not chain - lighter and less damaging to your bike) to spend your cash on. LCC also provide free cycle maps, so an alternative quiet route can be found. IMO cycling is about the quality of the ride, sometimes more so than the shortest A to B, and as Asset says it really won't take you long to get a bit fitter each time and those extra stones will disappear. I am a very experienced cyclist but I would avoid the OKR if I could.


Look for the thread here about 'Who Cycles To Work Form East Dulwich' (sorry, don't know how to do link thingy).


Good luck - you can do it!

I purchased a lock from the science museum shop it had a cable the thickness of a brake cable and it had a nubered code not a key.

But you could buy a cheap lock with a large enough hoop to slip your chain through and leave it locked and dangling from the saddle permanently.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...