Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But it is linked to poverty Loz. People don't turn on the heating because it becomes a choice between

> eating and warmth. Or do we only define poverty a being neither able to afford food AND heat, rather

> than one or the other.


No, it's not. It is linked to being poor. Poverty is not that you are spending 10% of your income on heating (the definition used). That's being poor. Poverty is no heating at all... or food... or a house.


There is little to no 'poverty' in the UK. There are a lot of poor people though.

Hmmmm......I understand your point but you are talking about absolute poverty. There's also relative poverty. All three definitions are widely used to describe various degrees of what is considered to be poverty. Poverty in it's single definition is 'the state of one who lacks a certain amount of material possessions or money'....so in that context, not having enough money to heat could be called an experience of poverty. And people do die in this country because they can't heat their homes.

I understand your point but language and definitions change as circumstances change. Personaly I think it's splitting hairs - poor/ poverty.


At the end of the day we have a growing poor who can not meet basic living costs. And we have a government intend with making being poor so unbearable that the millions of unemployed for example go and take the millions of jobs that um....aren't there. Goodness know what the millions of people in full time work and poor are supposed to do (a million of them need Housing Benefit to help pay their rent!).

The article lists poor insulation as a major issue. Purely out of personal experience here and abroad, I have to agree. When I lived in Switzerland, I noticed that even the dumpiest of buildings was highly insulated. Conversely the opposite often seems to be true here. Only the best properties seem to be properly insulated.

Hmmm, does spending 10% of your income on heating make you poor though? I agree, no heating probably makes you relatively poor. However, surely that term doesn't taken into account how much discretionary income you have in the first place.


Either way, insulation is the answer. However retro-fitting insulation into a Victoria property can at times pose its own difficulties with ventilation and damp...

But many of the porest live in social housing, where insulation (beyond windows) can not be improved. And in many southwark flats (because the rooms are so small), mould and mildew is a real problem if those windows aren't allowing ventilation and the heating is turned off. I know of many families who just simply can not afford to heat their homes.


10% IS a good figure because if you take home minimum wage, what you are left with after rent and council tax isn't very much (comparable to JSA in fact). An average single person (in a one bedroomed flat) spends ?13 a week on electric. Gas just doesn't become an affordable option. Hot water once a day will cost ?6 across the week. Heating for one hour a day will take it up to ?18. A person with just ?70 a week income after tax and rent absolutely will find themself unable to afford this. But that ?28 before tax and other bills is equivalent to around 10% of their income (on a minimum wage). So for those people it is a good indicator.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...