Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My wife was subjected to an attempted robbery for her Brompton bike tonight around 8.20pm on the path that runs from Dulwich Hamlet stadium to Green Dale.

A young man - aged in his teens in a hoodie wearing dark clothing - grabbed her bike and told her to let go of it.

She thinks he was hiding somewhere along that section close to the barriers knowing cyclists have to slow down there.

She refused to give him the bike and started shouting and screaming for help.

Thankfully someone in Shaw Road backing onto the pathway heard and shouted something like ?I?ll call the police?.

That seemed to scare off the attacker, who ran off and my wife made it home with the bike.

My wife is unharmed but shocked and the bike has some slight damage.

But obviously it could have been more serious and I wouldn?t advise putting up a struggle.


So please keep an eye out.

We?ve reported it to police.

And thank you to the person who intervened.

Last week my partner intervened when he saw three teenagers harassing a lone woman cyclist on that route. They gave him a bit of lip and slunk off, he reported it to the police non emergency number.


Looks like people should be careful when walking or cycling alone on that route.

Beulah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My wife was subjected to an attempted robbery for

> her Brompton bike tonight around 8.20pm on the

> path that runs from Dulwich Hamlet stadium to

> Green Dale.

> A young man - aged in his teens in a hoodie

> wearing dark clothing - grabbed her bike and told

> her to let go of it.

> She thinks he was hiding somewhere along that

> section close to the barriers knowing cyclists

> have to slow down there.

> She refused to give him the bike and started

> shouting and screaming for help.

> Thankfully someone in Shaw Road backing onto the

> pathway heard and shouted something like ?I?ll

> call the police?.

> That seemed to scare off the attacker, who ran off

> and my wife made it home with the bike.

> My wife is unharmed but shocked and the bike has

> some slight damage.

> But obviously it could have been more serious and

> I wouldn?t advise putting up a struggle.

>

> So please keep an eye out.

> We?ve reported it to police.

> And thank you to the person who intervened.


Sorry to hear about this, and thanks for the heads up. I hope you're wife isn't too shaken.

Beulah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My wife was subjected to an attempted robbery for

> her Brompton bike tonight around 8.20pm on the

> path that runs from Dulwich Hamlet stadium to

> Green Dale.

> A young man - aged in his teens in a hoodie

> wearing dark clothing - grabbed her bike and told

> her to let go of it.

> She thinks he was hiding somewhere along that

> section close to the barriers knowing cyclists

> have to slow down there.

> She refused to give him the bike and started

> shouting and screaming for help.

> Thankfully someone in Shaw Road backing onto the

> pathway heard and shouted something like ?I?ll

> call the police?.

> That seemed to scare off the attacker, who ran off

> and my wife made it home with the bike.

> My wife is unharmed but shocked and the bike has

> some slight damage.

> But obviously it could have been more serious and

> I wouldn?t advise putting up a struggle.

>

> So please keep an eye out.

> We?ve reported it to police.

> And thank you to the person who intervened.



Can you give further advice as to the perpetrator's description please?

Yes, as dependence on cycling increases thieves will learn to identify the more expensive models and it is not so difficult for a young male to intimidate a lone woman. Does anyone have some useful advice as to what more vulnerable cyclists can do to protect themselves?

Perhaps we could stop having chicane barriers on more 'remote paths' - aside from the discrimination under the equalities act angle, they do nothing to stop their stated aim of stopping mopeds driving along there!


There was better lighting put on Greendale a few years ago - but I don't think its particularly dark on that path - but i do think that the fact there are chicane barriers is a safety concern in this instance.

The copper said he'd raise the issue of CCTV / better protection with the Safer Neighbourhood Team.

I think at the very least, putting cameras either end of that pathway would be something of a deterrent.

My wife's memory of the attacker was too vague to be worth giving a description.

And as to how lone cyclists can make themselves less vulnerable: Sadly it seems avoiding the quieter routes may be necessary in some areas especially when it gets dark.

What a dilemma: risk your safety on the roads; or risk it on the quieter routes.


Don't forget the element of surprise can catch anyone out. The copper said more men had been targeted than women and men were often subject to greater violence.

Agree with that Beulah, it's easy to have hindsight and everyone needs to work out their own preference, but as an example - I won't ride on the Surrey Canal Path after dark, even though there are often lot of other cyclists using it.


There are two bridges you go under which are quite hidden, and you quite often get groups of people hanging out there, I'm sure with no bad intention, but I've also seen people get pushed off there so I just won't risk it, even though I hate the traffic on the alternative route.


Appreciate you raising the awareness of this one.

I really think it is an issue and will make some people think twice about the wisdom of active travel(walking or cycling). With the cost of living crisis and pressures all round theft will be on the rise.


Avoiding certain routes or not cycling at certain times is a practical solution but does not make cycling feel like the flexible and attractive transport option it is painted to be.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unless s/he had any extraordinary features further

> description would be meaningless.



"aged in his teens in a hoodie wearing dark clothing"?


Well we know it's a he, so far, but not that much more.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...