Jump to content

Recommended Posts

littlebelka I think I understand your posts and I didn't get the impression that you were criticising other people if they went down the medication route .

And I share your distrust of drug companies , their desire for profits and the effect that has on our treatment .


If it's any help I use Forest Hill Rd surgery and they discussed with me a range a treatments that were available .

I chose CRT which is group therapy focussing on relaxation and compassion ( towards oneself ) .


There was a few months waiting to start and I wasn't particularly optimistic but found it a huge help .Though like all these things I suspect much depends on the practicioner.


So if offered CRT I would say consider it ,though obviously different treatments for different states . Might not be appropriate for all and possibly not for PND ,but mentioning it to spread the word .

Saffron, I have described my own experiences and how I was treated and to what conclusions I came to.

I do not condemn people who took medication and do not classify them as the reckless parents and burden to the tax payer. To some people medication helped, to some not. I have considered that for me the pills would not be of much use and I stated the reason why I do think so.


P.S. What style of yoga do you do?


intexasatthe moment, thanks a lot for understanding.

I am as well registered at Forest Hill Rd and I do agree that lots of things depend on practitioner.

littlebelka Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saffron, I have described my own experiences and

> how I was treated and to what conclusions I came

> to.

> I do not condemn people who took medication and do

> not classify them as the reckless parents and

> burden to the tax payer. To some people medication

> helped, to some not. I have considered that for me

> the pills would not be of much use and I stated

> the reason why I do think so.

>

> P.S. What style of yoga do you do?

>

> intexasatthe moment, thanks a lot for

> understanding.

> I am as well registered at Forest Hill Rd and I do

> agree that lots of things depend on practitioner.



Well, thanks for coming back to clarify, but it still doesn't explain why you stated...


> Even if someone gets these pills for

> free, taxpayer still pays for this.


The taxpayer pays for ANY treatment that someone gets on the NHS for postpartum depression, regardless of whether it's drugs or therapy. It's totally irrelevant.


Are you saying that the NHS should not offer drug treatments for depression because the money goes to drug companies? Really that's muddying the water on the issue of treatment options, and it should not be an individual's over-riding concern when trying to chose a suitable treatment, particularly because the same paradigm applies to therapists.


I also think the statement is out of place on a thread where the OP is asking for help on postpartum depression and has chosen medication as a treatment option. But, feel free to disagree. I'm just expressing my opinion.

midivydale - yes, I see that the meds might well help with the sleep - and getting back to sleep - it was an issue I was in a real fix about, but I erred on the side of caution - my good days outbalanced my bad generally (though not during specific weeks where things were particularly tough with illness etc).


I guess I'm also just a cautious, and rather pessimistic person (hence the desire for CBT) - when they said that you *may* get anxiety for a fortnight - month, and you *may* experience weight gain...and those symptoms may stay about for a bit..I was out of there! I was sure both of those things *would* have happened to me, which would have tipped me over the edge! Stupid really. I'm sure it wouldn't have been bad - that's how risk averse I am.


I'm glad - OP - that you are trying them - how is it going?


Anyhow, I would have liked Saffron's GP quite a bit a few months ago.


Saffron - I was told they fast tracked PND for CBT treatment too..not happened in my case.


I feel absolutely fine when I've slept more than 5 hours during a night for a couple of nights - oh, I wish it was cheaper for the NHS to occasionally come round and babysit.

Ellie78, interesting that you say you desired CBT as you describe your decision based on being cautious/pessimistic about drug treatment options. I can actually say that I felt the exact opposite!


I felt cautious/pessimistic about therapy because past experience had shown me that this option could make me worse before I felt better, and could take longer than medication to produce any improvement.


Are these good decisions? Well, if we feel better, then I guess they are! :) The main thing about treating postpartum depression (or any mental illness), is to keep an open mind not only for others but for ourselves too.


I have to ask myself, if medication hadn't worked, would I have tried therapy? I like to think I would have tried just about anything, not only for my own sake but for my family! Therea are so many different ways to treat depression, everyone's sure to find something to help if only they keep an open mind. xx

Yeah... I think that I was concerned about the short term 'cons' of a possible peak in anxiety and a little bit of weight gain (god, so what, my thought should have been) perhaps demonstrates that I wasn't in too deep. Equally perhaps that attitude came from the illness itself.


You're right- whatever works really- it's the end result that matters.

Saffron Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Well, thanks for coming back to clarify, but it

> still doesn't explain why you stated...

>

> > Even if someone gets these pills for

> > free, taxpayer still pays for this.

>

> The taxpayer pays for ANY treatment that someone

> gets on the NHS for postpartum depression,

> regardless of whether it's drugs or therapy. It's

> totally irrelevant.

>

> Are you saying that the NHS should not offer drug

> treatments for depression because the money goes

> to drug companies? Really that's muddying the

> water on the issue of treatment options, and it

> should not be an individual's over-riding concern

> when trying to chose a suitable treatment,

> particularly because the same paradigm applies to

> therapists.

>


I know that taxpayer pays for all treatments, whether it is drugs or therapy.

There is one matter when people including you have tried several things and only when they have tried tablets there were positive results or I have met several people who came with the depressions to their GPs and just were offered antidepressants and that's it. Nothing else was offered.


If you think this statement is "out of place on a thread where the OP is asking for help on postpartum depression and has chosen medication as a treatment option." this is you opinion, you are entitled to it, but there is no need to be this aggressive if someone else is offering different methods. Someone asked what to do with the depression, I described my experience and how I fixed it, what to do next is up to someone.

No intended aggression, just being assertive: When I read something questionable, I'm naturally going to question it.


For example, the statement that the taypayer pays for pills, when indeed all NHS care is provided by the taxpayer, and postpartum women are fully entitled to the full range of care that the NHS offers, without prejudice, and free of charge at the point of access.


Is it really one matter when drug treatment has a positive outcome for some individuals, but another matter when only drugs are offered and nothing else [on the NHS] to another individual? Actually, no. Rereading my previous posts, it's apparent that these actually are two sides of the same argument. Indeed my recent experience was that therapy was offered, and nothing else! It's not two different matters, it's all part of the same matter.


Despite its remit to provide mental health care, the NHS does often struggle to do so effectively and efficiently. I believe this is independent of the source of funding (ie, the taxpayer), and instead due to poor quality of education for GPs on the subject of mental health treatments combined with biases towards treatment types, whether medication or counselling. It may help some women to actively pursue their treatment(s) of choice if they're aware of this, imho.

I felt very down off and on throughout the first year - found my son a very demanding baby (he had colic, which meant he had wind/pain and didn't find a good cure for a very long time) plus I think the general adjusting to parenthood really tests a relationship and you forget about yourself so much you run yourself into the ground with tiredness. My advice is if you feel down try and have a rest and a treat, be nice to yourself, that worked for me :) and if you feel permanently rotten and unable to lift yourself out of the blues I would seek help from GP who can recommend counselling and general advice on sleeping better, baby routines and so on. Hope you feel supported from this thread - I think most mums feel depressed at some point, not always in the first few months by any means - nobody can prepare you for motherhood esp not the sleep deprivation! xx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years      
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
    • I see that there was a government consultation started in July 2024, a response, and then a revision to the National Planning Policy Framework, and then to the Green Belt guidance in February 2025, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/green-belt .  It includes the updates but doesn't give the nescient much clue of what was materially changed. There will probably be some good, and less good, summaries to be found. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...