Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I didn't get to see it unfortunately, but the BBC website seems to confirm what you say. Of course they're not going to be strong about it because the Brit fighter won, but there are definite suggestions that it was contentious, particularly one judge only giving Hopkins 3 rounds, which even reading the reports will tell you is obvious bo!!ocks.


Fair play to Calzaghe I guess. He's obviously a good fighter, but I have never ever taken to him, and I hope he doesn't retire undefeated! He's now calling himself a legend killer, which for me is just another way of saying "I'm fighting old guys who are past their best". Roy Jones Jnr next, another fighter who had his best days a few years ago now!

I stayed awake till 3pm and despite being steaming drunk managed to watch the whole thing.


As a boxing nut and huge Calzaghe fan I spent a lot of it with my head in my hands between rounds. It was far from a classic but Hopkins has a style which tends to prevent open, exciting contests.


The 1st round knock-down was an eye-opener but Calzaghe never seemed unduly troubled thereafter. Most rounds were close but Hopkins rarely seemed to want to do more than spoil and defend. Calzaghe threw the most punches and kept coming forward. Tbh, I was surprised by the result, not because I didn't think he'd won, but because it was close and with American judges in Vegas it was always going to be difficult to get a decision. The right result but the scorecard of one judge might be slightly off the mark.


Calzaghe should be revered as a boxing great. He has beaten everyone put in front of him for over a decade. Boxing is notoriously political and often the fights fans want never materialise for one reason or another. Hopkins signed up to fight Calzaghe years ago and then doubled his fee overnight and the whole thing collapsed. Joe's unlucky that just as he came to his peak his division was weakened by the loss of fighters like Benn, Eubank (who Calzaghe practically retired), Collins etc.


And if anyone thinks Jones Jnr or Hopkins are washed up just ask Antonio Tarver or Felix Trinidad.

Eubank was a finished man after the tragic Michael Watson fight. I give very little credit to Calzaghe for that victory, because Eubank had no killer instinct anymore, and shouldn't have been in the ring. Obviously we'll never know, but I've always felt that Eubank or Benn at their peaks would have eaten Calzaghe, and Collins for that matter, he got them both at the arse ends of their careers, and talks like he was the better man, absolute bol!ocks.

It wasn't exactly a vintage Calzaghe performance, but name me one fighter who has looked good against "B-Hop"? Roy Jones and Jermain Taylor also just about eeked out close points decisions. Hopkins is such a defensive fighter (some would say negative), and he has a few dirty tactics up his sleeve... it was never going to be a pretty fight.


I can see how some judges and pundits may have scored in Hopkin's favour, but at least Joe won the fight by boxing, rather than holding and pretending to be injured!

Funnily enough, Roy Jones Jnr sayd before the fight that Calzaghe needed to throw lots of punches, because if he tried using them sparingly, he's be playing in to Hopkins' hands. Turned out he was spot on, as Calzaghe basically won the fight on his work rate.


I wish Mayweather was a heavier bloke, now that would be a challenge! He is amazing.


Whilst we're talking boxing, what do people think of Haye's chances at heavyweight? I think he can do well, but needs to be careful not to be too cocky.

re Haye: being cocky is part of the game... it's not enough to be a good boxer, you need to market yourself effectively to get in there with the big boys. I reckon that's one of the reasons why JC failed to get the big name fights until right at the end of his career.


I think Haye could bring some much needed athleticism, skill, excitement and personality to heavyweight boxing, currently dominated by lumbering, podgy, 6'6 blokes. I hope he doesn't waste time by getting caught up in the domestic circus with the likes of Williams and Skelton, I'd like to see him get right in there and challenge someone like Ruiz, Rahman or Toney.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hope he doesn't waste time by getting caught up in the domestic circus with the likes of Williams and Skelton, I'd like to see him get right in there and challenge someone like Ruiz, Rahman or Toney.



Quite right. Think he's already in a league above the UK guys, as he is a world champ of his weight, so the step up should be swift, he won' have to earn his shot like these guys do.


You're right about marketing yourself though, Audley decided to go it alone, and got everything wrong and ended up a joke. It's a shame, because I think he did have promise.


With regards the cockiness though, I used to love Eubank, because he was the sort of comedy villan. Naseem Hamed however was just a bit too cocky, and as good as he was, it just made me want to see him get knocked out! Was shocked at his career though, he was still so young when he lost the title, and he just disappeared.

Not quite at fighting weight is he?!

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41507000/jpg/_41507170_naseem203.jpg


I like Haye a lot. Good chin, fast hands, devastating punch power, good looking, charismatic. If he keeps his focus he could go all the way. I just prey he doesn't bulk up too much for the heavies and end up like some of the blimps currently knocking around a la:


James "Who ate all the pies" Toney

http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2006/writers/richard_hoffer/03/20/toney.rahman/p1_toney_0320.jpg

thats a couple of big boys,btw did anyone see the prize-fighter show on sky last week, 8 blokes fighting on the night for 25k, few porkers among that lot, but terrific idea and a great nights entertainment. it was won by a bloke from belfast who in true rocky style wasnt the best boxer but he just kept coming forward and in the end the boxing purist dolan who was the favourite on the night just couldn,t cope.
not because I didn't think he'd won, but because it was close and with American judges in Vegas it was always going to be difficult to get a decision. The right result but the scorecard of one judge might be slightly off the mark.


In all fairness to American judges, they usually favour the boxer who comes forward.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Of course they do, watching cookery shows and buying cook books is a national pastime. However you raise a good point that some people claim they are time poor and end up eating out / takeaways as sometimes a quick macciedee is cheaper and easier than making a quick nutrious family meal.  However to put it in balance, not many people have the knowledge, confidence and time to cook Persian so good luck to team persepolis on this venture. 
    • London doesn’t have a lot of Argentinian places specialising in empanadas, which suggests demand isn’t that great. There are many neighbourhoods with none at all or even nearby.  So for a mini-chain like Chango (several branches in SW London) to open here where there’s already a well established family run place doing the same feels a bit off.  I’ll be giving Chacarero my ongoing custom. 
    • This is so helpful, everyone, thank you. @green bean Yes we have just (as of yesterday) installed the same external blinds you mention! We already had blackout blinds and we now have the external awnings too. Of course that will guarantee the end of the summer sunshine but I can see that they're going to be helpful as they let the light through but not the glare of the sun - I'm fed up of working in darkness with both the blackout blinds closed on sunny days. We'll see how we go with those for a bit but I reckon we'll get a couple of quotes from the other recommendations in case we end up going the whole hog. @penfold Love the idea of getting solar+batteries to offset the electricity usage so will look into that.  Thanks, all.
    • Yes Sally, I've emailed him several times since Xmas. I don't contact Councillors frequently but when I've done so over the years, I've found them generally engaged and responsive. It's unprecedented to just be ignored and, regardless of the query I'm raising, that's worrying from the point of view of  our local democratic voice. Its a Councillors role to represent local people! A different thread on here made reference to a lack of response from one of our ward councillors and, since there are only two, I'm guessing it's the same one. I'm following up my own concern separately but I'm asking on here about whether others have had the same problem. I'd like to think it's a one-off but, increasingly, I suspect it's not. Hope that gives a bit more context!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...