Jump to content

Solicitor


loubelou

Recommended Posts

Lou,


I know you asked for someone in the area but I can highly reccomend Tim Jordan of Quality Solicitors. We recently used Tim for the conveyancing on the purchase of a property. We found his details through the forum. We were first time buyers so the whole ordeal was pretty stressful. However, Tim responded to any emails/calls very promptly even in the evenings and on weekends. The transaction wasn't as smooth as we'd hoped and there was extra work involved, but when the bill came through at the end we were presently surprised (very unusual when dealing with solicitors) as the bill was simply what we'd been quoted at the start. The vendor was extremely difficult and without Tim's level headeadness and practical advice, I'm not sure the deal would have gone through.


His quote was very reasonable (much cheaper than local solicitors) and with technology the way it is, it wasn't a problem at all that we never met Tim or couldnt just pop into his office. He even gave advice and before we had agreed to use him as a conveyancer.


He's quick, very reasonable, but not local, so I guess he ticks 2 of your boxes.


Good luck either way!


His contact details are below.


T 01925 604 713

E [email protected]

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31011-solicitor/#findComment-633016
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...