Jump to content

Surma - award ....


Sue

Recommended Posts

Did a search but can't find an existing thread solely about Surma.


In the April issue of SE22 magazine, Surma has a half page ad saying "Surma restaurant wins 'Best Indian restaurant in East Dulwich'!"


and 'Voted for by the registered users of the East Dulwich Forum'.


Now, Surma did once win that award, but (and I stand to be corrected) it was in something like 2006??


Yet the weasel word "wins" makes it sound like it was very recent ...


I think with each year that passes this gets more and more cheeky. Is it just me who thinks that this is not acceptable advertising content?


I also like their statement "We use only the highest possible ingredients." Does this mean from the highest shelf in their kitchen, or that the ingredients are all sourced from a mountain top somewhere? :))

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31073-surma-award/
Share on other sites

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why would/should the publisher of a two bit parish

> rag have to check the legal veracity of an ad

> which probably cost a few quid? Sue is rightly

> pointing out that this ain't right. Unless Surma

> have evidence to the contrary.


Because the two bit parish rag is posted through doors of parishioners, and because the said rag ran the 'competition' in the first place.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31073-surma-award/#findComment-633617
Share on other sites

Tandoori nights have a very old Monica Ali article mentioning them, outside on their forecourt. I can't see that what Surma is doing is any different, and I think both are legitimate. it is up to the customer. If I see a restaurant using old awards/publicity etc., I will always wonder why.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31073-surma-award/#findComment-633650
Share on other sites

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a shop in N London that I'm told had a

> virtually perpetual Closing Down Sale notice

> outside.


There'a a suit shop round the corner to my office, which has a permanent closing down sale. It caused great amusement when the artists impression of the Crossrail station in 2015 featured the same shop, with the same "everything must go" sign in the window.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31073-surma-award/#findComment-633689
Share on other sites

Sue


If you (or anyone else) feels strongly that this is misleading advertising, you can complain to the Advertising Standards Authority about it, here: http://www.asa.org.uk/Consumers/How-to-complain/Online-Form/Step1.


The ASA has rules which prevent misleading advertising and can take action when its rules are breached.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31073-surma-award/#findComment-633809
Share on other sites

a_m Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue

>

> If you (or anyone else) feels strongly that this

> is misleading advertising, you can complain to the

> Advertising Standards Authority about it, here:

> http://www.asa.org.uk/Consumers/How-to-complain/On

> line-Form/Step1.

>

> The ASA has rules which prevent misleading

> advertising and can take action when its rules are

> breached.


xxxxxx


Thanks, but I don't feel strongly enough about it to shop Surma to the ASA!


Not sure the ASA would be interested in a small ED curry house's ad though ....


I shall just avoid Surma - but I do anyway .....

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31073-surma-award/#findComment-633978
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I have just read on open council network that Tesco had applied for an alcohol licence, and an ATM license, according to the article. Not sure if permission was granted, due to local opposition, citing another supermarket might encourage shoplifting and anti-social behaviour.
    • In an ideal world, yes, more tax would be directed to the justice system. Because a lot of suspects don't get a fair trial and wrongly convicted. Often they'll have a long list of previous, so police are picking the low hanging fruit. And because legal aid solicitors and barristers' pay is now so anaemic, they simply don't have the time to work a case and defend it properly. So you probably see more people behind bars than there should be.  It started with Brown and then got way worse with Cameron, when he essentially tried to turn legal aid firms into giant call centres and put the contracts out to tender. Even since then, the system gets squeezed more every year. 
    • Courts are in session from 10am to mid-day then 2pm to 4pm. Four hours a day with a two hour lunch is probably the cause.
    • You pay tax to fix problems  you underfund stuff my faking tax cuts and the breakdown of the system is what you get there are no cheap or easy fixes. It will take money and time - and people lack patience 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...