Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I not going to join either side on this ( the Public celebration of her her death), however, public figures that do push through policies they know to be so harmful to various groups of society are fair game. It may not appeal to your sense of correctness but probably indicates how her policies affected you. Politicians are fair game at all times, this strange sense of don't speak ill of the dead is misjudged and inappropriate, especially to those for whom the debate about the effect of her policies ( both when put though and their continuing presence) still continues. Not necessarily a celebration, but we should allow a genuine debate about her and the effects she has had. Just because she died doesn't and shouldn't put these things off the agenda

Sorry Rosie, but I fight the current shower and I fought the inbetween lot, but I'm happy to reserve a bit of bile for the woman who cared nothing for the people whose lives and communities she destroyed and replaced with consumerism, greed and rabid selfishness.


Hated her when she was alive and nothing's changed now she's dead, other than a small black cloud that's lifted from my grim Northern past where the sun has momentarily poked through.


Just wish she'd take a load of the current lot with her.

JDR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Not necessarily a celebration, but we should allow a

> genuine debate about her and the effects she has had.


I don't think anyone would reject the idea of a debate of her, but those posters advocating 'celebration' of her death are truly loathsome. How would they like the local community to cheer happily at their mother's death?

Loz Wrote:

...

> I don't think anyone would reject the idea of a

> debate of her, but those posters advocating

> 'celebration' of her death are truly loathsome.

> How would they like the local community to cheer

> happily at their mother's death?


My mother didn't ruin thousands of people's lives and refuse to listen to their pain, she just did it to a few of us!


Re: the Brand article, I agree it's fantatsic and it's also here in the Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/russell-brand/margaret-thatcher-our-unm_b_3046390.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Re: the Brand article, I agree it's fantatsic and it's also here in the Huffington Post:


And the best part of that article pointed out that Thatcherism died in 1990. All that has happened since then that continued her political legacy is not her fault, but the fault of the politicians elected since then. And, of course, those that elected them.


Yesterday an old lady died. Nothing changed.

I disagree Loz, she was the beginning of an onslaught that has smashed it's way through our education, health and other public services for the benfit of her millionaire friends and to the detriment of the majority of the rest of us.


This is another good article but a bit more political than Brand's which explains why some of us hate her and want the current lot to join her. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/04/margaret-thatcher-state-funeral-protests

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I disagree Loz, she was the beginning of an onslaught that has smashed it's way through our

> education, health and other public services for the benfit of her millionaire friends and to the

> detriment of the majority of the rest of us.


Well, we can probably disagree on the politics of Thatcherite reforms until the cows come home. but the point remains, she ceased to be PM 23 years ago. If people followed her lead, then that's their fault, not hers. I can tell you what to do, but if you are silly enough to listen to me, you need to take some responsibility for that.


And another article in the Gruin (of all places)...


What might have happened if Thatcher never existed.

No LadyD, it's not a guess.


The only alternative to the future described in that article would have been someone else doing a 'Thatcher'.


The fact that it was Thatcher that did it is largely neither here nor there - and no excuse to demean ourselves by pursuing her into the grave like a lynch mob pulling pieces out of her body.


The foolish aspect to those that despise her is that they lack the imagination to consider the alternatives - and most importantly whether it would have been an improvement.


The truth is that the nation was staring in the face of a socialist implosion that would leave us not in a glorious agrarian idyll, but rather a desperate post industrial clusterfuck European outlier like the Ukraine.


To claim otherwise is revisionist.

I think there are two points here.


One thing to speak ill of her which I've no problem with (although personally my views are somewhere inbetween).


The second thing is celebrating a death. This is 2013 not 1613. We've come along way from public hangings and putting folk in stocks. If you want that sort of behaviour go out to Saudi Arabia.

Margaret Thatcher may be dead, BUT the damage she did to this Country is still evident..


1. She allowed people to Buy their Council Homes. (many could only just afford to do so)

Many of these homes were in a poor state of repair and the Councils wanted rid of them.


2. People then lost their jobs as many industries were closed down (Mines, Steel)


3. Homes were reposesed.


3. Rich landlords bought these homes at auctions.


4. The homes were rented out or redeveloped.


As a result there is now little affordable Social Housing Stock.

So now a new Tory Government has created the so called Bedroom Tax.

And we all Know the current situation.


More people may lose there homes.


Foxy.

Agree with JohnL and Lowlander... I've no problem speaking ill of her, she was tremendously unpopular when she was still alive, so why should that change now? But talk of celebration is pointless and rather juvenile, she'd had no influence for many years, her death doesn't suddenly make the world a better place.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Margaret Thatcher may be dead, BUT the damage she

> did to this Country is still evident..

>

> 1. She allowed people to Buy their Council

> Homes. (many could only just afford to do so)

> Many of these homes were in a poor state of

> repair and the Councils wanted rid of them.

>

> 2. People then lost their jobs as many industries

> were closed down (Mines, Steel)

>

> 3. Homes were reposesed.

>

> 3. Rich landlords bought these homes at

> auctions.

>

> 4. The homes were rented out or redeveloped.

>

> As a result there is now little affordable Social

> Housing Stock.

> So now a new Tory Government has created the so

> called Bedroom Tax.

> And we all Know the current situation.

>

> More people may lose there homes.

>

> Foxy.


Labour started it, she extended the policy. Anyway this thread is about the morals of celebrating death.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, this really made me chuckle. It's like you met my brother as he would be the one taking more than his share. Plus the 'pikey' chutney is a winner. Unusual as in can't be identified??? Sadly I'm not the host otherwise I would definitely do that I regularly shop in the Cheese Block and am a fan. But as people have pointed out, there is no cheese shop that charges less based on bulk, so Aldi unusual cheeses may be what the familam receive! Yay, so I can get discounted mouse nibbled cheese still! Oooo, now I do love a Stinking Bishop. It actually offends my stepmum by it's stinkiness but luckily she is not one of the attendees at this particular gathering.  This is blooming genius. It's actually my partner who has the biggest issue with buying in plastic so I will have to hide the wrappers from him!
    • I like the look of SD's Sweet and Sour chicken. It's a really good dish when made freshly and well. I'll need to try it. Sad that Oriental Star and Lucky House by Dulwich Library both closed at a similarish time. They were decent, reliable, "British Chinese" takeaways.
    • William S Spicer was a family-owned firm that initially made horse drawn delivery carts for breweries (especially Fullers Brewery in W London) and horse-drawn trams. With the advent of the internal combustion engine, they successfully made the transition to coachbuilding delivery vehicles London's leading department stores using German engines. WW2 interrupted their business for obvious reasons, and their postwar attempt to become the local assembler and distributor of Bulgarian "Izmama" trucks was not blessed with good fortune. In 1953, the company pivoted to being a full-service garage, leveraging their reputation for honesty and excellence.  In 1972, the Dulwich site was sold to its present owners. William S Spicer III (the grandson of the founder) retired to Lancashire, where he founded a sanctuary for the endangered ineptia beetle, which he had encountered in Bulgaria while travelling for business. In 1978, Spicer was awarded an OBE for conservation, and a newly-discovered  beetle was named after him by the Bulgarian People's National Academy of Sciences - Byturus Spicerius.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...