Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi All


Was hoping to get some independent feedback on the Green Deal scheme and if it is actually worthwhile.


We have moved into a doer upper that is freezing cold and needs floorboard insulation, double glazed windows, new rads, probably a new boiler at some stage - these are just the things we know about. I'm sure if we had an assessment that they may find other things as well.


Was wondering if anyone had actually signed up the green deal and what their experience had been so far. I appreciate it's only recently launched.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31106-the-green-deal/
Share on other sites

Floorboard insulation? Do you mean suspending insulation under bare floorboards on a ground floor?


Double glazing would take at least 15-25 years to pay itself back. Do you feel you need new radiators? Do they even qualify?


A good article here. Probably worth getting an assessment if it's free and you can cherry pick the quick and cheap wins.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/greenproperty/9924717/Eco-living-could-you-take-out-a-Green-Deal-loan.html

I think there's bit of confusion isn't there? t-e-d?


I may have misunderstood, but it's just a loan isn't it? Yes, it's paid back through a levy on your electricity bill and can only be used on greening your house, but it's just a loan?


The government seem to offer a few hundred quid subsidy at most, but if you're going to do major heating or insulation work it'll be a ?10,000 loan paid off over 25 years at around 7% to 8%.


There's even early repayment fines. Some deal. HMG seem to be loan-sharking?


You'd be better off in many cases simply extending your mortgage wouldn't you?


Happy to hear that I'm wrong?

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You could be right Hugunot


Indeed, he/she/whatever is entirely correct. Though I wouldn't be quite so cynical. Although you will end up with a dodgy loan and some 'consultants' in your life, it can be worthwhile, especially if you're going to rent it out, in which case it'll be the tenants who pay the loan off (as it's them that see the benefit - unless, that is, you go for a cashback deal before renting it out, but only a grasping cynic would think of that dodge).


Originally, I think, the Green Deal was just focused on insulation, rather than other forms of home-improvements, but that seems to have changed, possibly because cavity wall insulation isn't a visible reason for putting the rent up (no matter if tenants would be already paying for it all), so you may be able to get it all done.


You do, however, have to get an 'assessor' round, who will almost certainly not be trying to drum up work for their employer, and therefore won't necessarily focus on adding wildly expensive, and hard-to-repay, elements to your loan, so you might want to do your own sums. Unless tenants will be paying, naturally.


It's still not entirely clear what the loans will be secured against or who will be underwriting them, which may mean everything's been thought through clearly. It looks like the energy companies will be on the hook for defaulters, but that might depend on the exact terms of the contract. As I understand it, the deal-seeker (who may be the owner, landlord or tenant) gets a contract with the Green Deal Provider, who gets paid by the energy company (or one of them, depending if the dual-fuel trap's been avoided) who has a contract with the bill-payer (who may or may not be the owner, landlord or tenant) and nothing can possibly go wrong, apart from the minor inconvenience of a disconnection if a bill doesn't get paid. But I'd check the terms of any agreement very carefully before signing it.

As I understand it the green deal was always intended for any measure that leads to an improvement in the energy efficiency of a home, not just insulation.


Agree that with an interest rate of 7 - 8% the Green Deal could prove more expensive than taking out a home owner loan / remortgaging

Thanks all, for your input. I'm not too convinced by the scheme either, the only thing I thought might make it worthwhile is the Government cashback for various things.


One of the things that puts me off most is that the debt is tied to your home, and that if you sell the new owner takes on the debt. Can imagine that putting a lot of potential buyers off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...