Jump to content

Recommended Posts

the calton/court lane junction now looks even more horrendous - there are around 10 x no car/no bike signs attached to all the barricades and any available spot. It looks utterly awful and I dread to think how much that lot cost.


I have to say I am fed up with the complete lack of understanding of how that space is meant to work (the council have not really been helpful in addressing this) - bikes whizzing all over the place with no idea of which side of the road (in the car free area) they are meant to be. I cycle thru there several times a week and the school times are a shocker. Dads on cargo bikes jumping the lights, kids and toddlers wandering around the car free area but with bikes still gunning thru, bikes swerving about on pavements - the lack of cars has created some sort of cycle anarchy.


grumpy old cyclist....

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/311170-dulwich-village-junction/
Share on other sites

LTNs have silent majority support it seems from the elections. Probably because lots of people get quieter streets and the people getting fined, are the ones who don't know the area and therefore probably don't live and can't vote here..!


I thinks that's complete rubbish - the election was fought and won far more on the grounds of national politics in general as well as disgust with some of the antics at No 10 and views about prices, tax and so on. This area has ben solidly Labour for some time; the little local difficulty with LTNs notwithstanding most people ignored that with an opportunity, mid-term, to wave a warning flag at the Tories. Nobody was so stupid as to believe that LTNs in Dulwich would be sufficient to topple the Labour apparat in Southwark or to change a damn thing locally.

I do think the Labour party plays a much better game in the local elections. In my local ward, they got three seats with 52% of the vote leaving the other 48% who voted unrepresented.

The Greens got 23% split amongst 3 candidates. I'd say their vote would have stayed the same if they had just one candidate and they would have got that one candidate elected as they would have beaten the lowest labour candidate who got 15%.


I would agree it is complete rubbish that it was an election on LTNs or make assumptions about the quiet people who may not live on quiet streets.


grumpy old cyclist No.2 .........

I cycle that route on the school run daily and agree its a total mess. Pedestrians (including small children) wandering into the road, no clear directions for cyclists coming from different directions, delivery vans parking right across the road. The lights for the crossing have been covered for months so no-one walking knew if it was a green light for bikes- consequently I've met a lot of people asking if the bike signals are working, given the state of it all. Feels like only a matter of time before there's an accident.
The lawlessness continues past the junction up to the park entrance near the Gallery - the pavement from the corner cemetery to the park gate is often used by cyclists of the “nice” kind who obviously think that because they’re upper-middle class and are cycling on expensive bikes with tots and/or pooches it’s magically legal to ride on the pavement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...