Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm surprised they have time to strike.. what with having to get up at 4am to mark papers, marking those papers well into the night and having to spend their meagre 13 weeks of holiday time marking papers every day too.


(Not the teachers I know, who - just between you and me - enjoy their jobs and the free-time perks that come with it)

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bob, for someone who freely admits to wandering

> around in his dressing gown and slippers late into

> the afternoon criticising teacher perks may be a

> tad hypocritical. Would any of us notice if the

> Musicians Union called for a downing of tools? ;-)


It would only be hypocritical if I'd ever been on strike. Unfortunately I don't have the luxury of that option.

Hee Hee


I may moan about crappy aspects of the industry in work to others in my line (and be assured there is plenty to moan about), but I won't be asking for (or expecting) any sympathy from anyone else. It's my choice. It's a free world. I can do something else if I don't like what's on offer.

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> are you nurturing future generations though *Bob*?



This isn't about nurturing future generations; it's about trying to score a bit more money at an opportunistic moment.


Good luck 'em if they get it (who doesn't want a bit more money?), but there's no moral high ground in play here.

Missing the issue as always folks. Teachers in the UK are not badly paid but they aren?t particularly well paid either. The thing is that teaching is the most important profession in any society*. So the issue is, do you want to make the profession attractive enough to attract and retain the highest calibre of people? More money is the most obvious way to do this.


*Disagree if you like but if you do I will take this opportunity to call you a fucking idiot in advance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I totally agree it just seems that it a thing nowadays.  It must be due to how fireworks are sold. 
    • Well worth a read   https://manchestermill.co.uk/the-men-who-raised-the-flags/
    • If it was limited to a couple of days a year, so we all knew, that would be fine. In the last few years (and it is a recent thing) you get random fireworks going off any time after dusk for half the year. It does more than cause problems for pets and wildlife- it can mean lasting damage and massive expense and hassle for pet owners. All because some get a buzz out of loud bangs.
    • Ohh dear.  Fireworks can be great fun.  Where I used to live the kids would have firework wars/games.  Watching them was more enjoyable than watching  TV. (Which you could hardly hear due to the pops and bangs).  It's not like anyone/anything could stop them. I would still prefer organised public displays that are affordable.   And I agree that fireworks cause problems for wild life, pets and people.   It seems to be one of those things that just happens so we have to put up with it.  But it is still not as problematic here as in other areas in London - that's for sure.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...