Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Residents have been asking what is going on in Melbourne Grove with the double yellow lines - I've asked council engineers to send out a letter to elegantly explain the Thames Water letter that went out, but I'll post what I know here in the meantime in order to address concerns (please note that this is a layman's explanation and not official!).


The section of houses (odd numbers) on Melbourne Grove from the corner of Colwell Road to the corner of Blackwater were converted from old Victorian shops and workshops. Due to this, that section has a very odd arrangement of shared sewers which has been picked up during the ongoing sewer assessment that is being conducted in the area.


Thames Water has come up with a solution to address this arrangement, but it involves digging 5m deep ditches along one side of the road, hence the temporary double yellow lines to restrict parking.


The other side of Melbourne Grove (even numbers) will be kept clear to allow traffic to pass through, in an attempt to minimise disruption to the whole area (the other option is to close off the whole section, which would probably cause chaos, so the chosen set-up is the least worst option in my opinion).


The works are due to begin at 8am on Monday morning (Apr 22nd) and last for approx 4 weeks. They will start at the Colwell Road end and work sequentially to the Blackwater end. At the end of the works, the double yellow lines will be burnt off and we can go back to normal.


I would suggest that drivers plan to avoid this end of Melbourne Grove until the end of May, unless you live locally.


I've met all the engineers now and the supervisors who will be on site... they are all really pleasant and determined to make this as painless as possible.

Dear Guys,


To clarify my layman's description... I didn't mean that shared sewers were odd, I meant that the shared sewer system along that section of Melbourne Grove was odder than most. There is a whole range of criteria to be considered which I am not qualified to comment on, but I don't think that shared sewers within "normal" terraced houses on other roads will be affected.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...