Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Triple whammy for local house prices....



Rising mortgage rates nationally


Loss of over inflated Foxton asking prices


An influx of poundland clientelle to our beautiful 'lordship Lane village'



I mean how am I expected to push past all those tracksuits while I'm carrying a selection of cheeses from Mons (not to mention the quince paste).....

 

so as you say " poundland clientelle to our beautiful 'lordship Lane village' when was lordship lane part of your beautiful 'lordship Lane village, and i bet you go to peckham £1 shop on the quiet. and as for tracksuits have you seen the price of them, a for as you say " selection of cheeses from Mons" the £1 shop sell cheese. and please don't call them poundland clientelle should be clientele but most of people who use the shops ARE customers , got to go to peckham £1 shop just can't wait to go to the village £1 shop 🏪

The trouble with Lidl is, it's so cheap you end up buying a load of stuff you don't really need.


Like IKEA.


I have to stay away from Lidl for that reason 🤣


And yes, there is one just down the road from King's.

 

Self control at all times

While Lidl may be "cheaper" than the other supermarkets, the good thing about Lidl is the quality of some of their specific products and the weekly opportunity to try new things when they have "flavour of the week" weeks. A couple of weeks ago they had Italian week, some lovely biscuits that were really cheap and worth every penny. And dried mushrooms etc.

While Lidl may be "cheaper" than the other supermarkets, the good thing about Lidl is the quality of some of their specific products and the weekly opportunity to try new things when they have "flavour of the week" weeks. A couple of weeks ago they had Italian week, some lovely biscuits that were really cheap and worth every penny. And dried mushrooms etc.

 

I agree it's often good quality, and very good value for money.

Which was the cheapest supermarket in August 2022?

Latest research by trade magazine The Grocer(opens in new tab) reveals that discount retailer Lidl is the cheapest supermarket for everyday groceries, with Aldi a close second. The weekly shopping price survey compared the cost of a shopping basket of 33 typical grocery items at the biggest supermarkets (Asda, Tesco, Sainsbury’s, Morrisons and Waitrose), and compared it to the same basket at both Lidl and Aldi. Lidl’s basket came in at a total of £39.96, which was only 69p cheaper than runner-up Aldi, but a whopping £21.05 cheaper than the most expensive basket from Waitrose.


Overall, the supermarkets were ranked as follows from cheapest to the

The trouble with Lidl is, it's so cheap you end up buying a load of stuff you don't really need.


Like IKEA.


I have to stay away from Lidl for that reason 🤣


And yes, there is one just down the road from King's.

 

Oh, lucky you, miss loaded. What other shops do you walk around and just freely buy whatever takes your fancy, even though you don't need it, because its just so cheap? Should we keep you away from Moxons too?

The trouble with Lidl is, it's so cheap you end up buying a load of stuff you don't really need.


Like IKEA.


I have to stay away from Lidl for that reason 🤣


And yes, there is one just down the road from King's.

 

Oh, lucky you, miss loaded. What other shops do you walk around and just freely buy whatever takes your fancy, even though you don't need it, because its just so cheap? Should we keep you away from Moxons too?

 

Changed your forum name again, have you?

Hallelujah!


At last we have a sensible rebuke to the last 20 odd years of creeping yuppification. Sick to death of all the poncy wannabes showing off with their organic vegan ‘look at me’ shopping bags full of overpriced tat.


Poundland will allow ordinary people to use the lane again for essentials, without having to take out a second bloody mortgage for the privilege.


Louisa.

Ditto!


 

Hallelujah!


At last we have a sensible rebuke to the last 20 odd years of creeping yuppification. Sick to death of all the poncy wannabes showing off with their organic vegan ‘look at me’ shopping bags full of overpriced tat.


Poundland will allow ordinary people to use the lane again for essentials, without having to take out a second bloody mortgage for the privilege.


Louisa.

Hallelujah!


At last we have a sensible rebuke to the last 20 odd years of creeping yuppification. Sick to death of all the poncy wannabes showing off with their organic vegan ‘look at me’ shopping bags full of overpriced tat.


Poundland will allow ordinary people to use the lane again for essentials, without having to take out a second bloody mortgage for the privilege.


Louisa.

 

For staples, M&S Food Hall has been cheaper or the same as Sainsbury's. They're cheaper for 1 Pint milk than the Co-op.

The co-op has always been a rip off. Wouldn’t catch me going in there. And not a fan of DKH Sainsbury either (although they do a price lock range now which is ok-ish). Ironic that M&S offer a cheaper essentials range than the two local rivals.


The loss of Iceland had a big impact on the poorer folk of ED. A impact some sneery forum users mocked for a while. But it seems, what goes around comes back around. No one cares about the loss of another estate agent, not when people are struggling to pay energy bills and put food on the table.


Welcome to ED Poundland, with arms wide open.


Louisa.

I have found that co-op's prices have increased to the extent that hey are more expensive for staples and have increased prices i.e. milk than the other supermarkets.

Sainsbury's Price lock range is not actually price locked, prices of these items have been "sneakily" increased even though they are apparently "price locked - NOT"

Always was under the impression that M&S was the most expensive locally but according to BB that is not the case?


The necessity to shop at more than one supermarket has been an ongoing requirement to save money and that appears to need to continue. Looking out for price reductions on specific Specials that are needed is the way to go.


Unfortunately we are ALL suffering and those independents who charge more than the going rate my in time regret the decision when the footfall to there door goes elsewhere.


But one thing is sure, the electorate won't forget about three years of Johnson sleaze and Truss and Kwarteng's disastrous start with escalating the cost of living crisis and punishing those with a mortgage with significantly higher monthly repayments, crashing the economy and if things were not bad enough already. Added to that the domestic fuel crisis, with the punishing and totally unjustified daily standing charge increases. How these can be justified beggars belief!


The standing charge has increased by 185% since September 2019, the cost of gas per KWh increased by 373% and the cost of electricity per KWh has increased by 260% over the same period.


Come the next election if not before, the Conservatives will be booted out of office for making an utter shambles of the economy and making its people suffer.

Welcome to ED Poundland, with arms wide open.


Louisa.


Actually, Louisa, I can't agree. This is likely to severely damage the trade of Farmers - an excellent local shop which has provided good value services to ED over a long period. Poundland is a chain, aggressively priced and whose quality, in my view (others may differ) is not good. It will damage a quality local shop which has gone out of its way to provide a good local service. I know you have always championed chains which purport (not always accurately), to offer good value - and I do agree that losing Iceland was sad, although gaining M&S was a good thing - better would have been to have had both, in my view - but if Poundland comes and squeezes out Farmers then that loss will, again in my view, be worse than losing Iceland.

https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/caseDetails.do?action=dispatch&keyVal=RH0E8AKB06900&caseType=BuildingControl


Unless someone at Southwark Council’s Planning Department enjoys trolling internet forum’s, it seems highly unlikely this is a fake application.


Louisa.

Welcome to ED Poundland, with arms wide open.


Louisa.


Actually, Louisa, I can't agree. This is likely to severely damage the trade of Farmers - an excellent local shop which has provided good value services to ED over a long period. Poundland is a chain, aggressively priced and whose quality, in my view (others may differ) is not good. It will damage a quality local shop which has gone out of its way to provide a good local service. I know you have always championed chains which purport (not always accurately), to offer good value - and I do agree that losing Iceland was sad, although gaining M&S was a good thing - better would have been to have had both, in my view - but if Poundland comes and squeezes out Farmers then that loss will, again in my view, be worse than losing Iceland.

 

I love Farmer’s, I’ve been going there since I was a youngster and I know how well loved it is, and more importantly how much effort is put into the business. However, I have to disagree. The whole point of a chain is to create footfall onto a high street. Rather than damage their business model, I would imagine it would do the opposite. Nothing wrong with healthy competition, and tbf, they offer something relatively different anyway.


Louisa.

  • Administrator

I’m not convinced this is going to happen, would Poundland really want to pay the high rents now being asked in Lordship Lane? Someone’s being mischievous

 

There's a Poundland in Chiswick and Putney High streets, both of which are upmarket areas with high street rents I'd assume to be higher than LL. So clearly its working for them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...