Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We've just received a letter home from school about the student support centre. If you get one too then I suggest you read this article


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/9018047/The-2700-tuition-hard-sell.html


It's not exactly a scam but very sharp practice at least, signing people up to a credit agreement which they can't get out of if they decide the programmes don't suit their child. Several thousand pounds for something you don't want would be a big issue for most.


The schools receive a fee for the number of forms they send back.

newtoedf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LA school - an awful lot of schools are caught out

> by this firm.

>

> It might be worth sending a copy of the article to

> your school and warning them in advance. Hindsight

> is a wonderful thing...


Surely the school, especially the headteacher, would be aware that they are sending out advertising material in their name? I would have thought that the school would have had to say 'yes' to the firm providing the materials.


Except perhaps the firm is going straight to LAs for approval and LAs are saying 'yes' on behalf of the school and are allowing this (does the ?150 go to the school or the LA?). Wouldn't surprise me, profiteering at any cost is rampant these days.

The standard practice is for the school to send out a letter on their letterhead and enclose the leaflet from the student support centre. The school are very clear that they are circulating this but not (I hope!)about the sales practices of the firm involved. That's why it is probably a good idea to alert them in advance.


I dropped a letter of complaint in this morning to the head and one to the chair of governors and explained the situation to the office staff - we'll see what this afternoon's book bags hold...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm guessing they're busy. I found out just now that the SNT has tracked down the kids who attacked my dog, had strong words with their parents, and the gang has now broken up. I got a lot of detail, which I won't go into here, but it sounds as if they were also quite compassionate towards some of the kids, who came from less than optimal backgrounds, shall we say.  I know that those kids had nothing to do with the attack of the man in August and that they are also aware of the fireworks problem. Sounds like good community policing. 
    • I'd rather go to actual local Safer Neighbourhood Team meetings and see the whites of their eyes.  Ours in Peckham Rye Park ward (maps of areas the ward covers are on the police website; no idea about the new one!) used to be very well attended, but sadly now not so.  The local police of the SNT seem to change far too regularly so they never have a chance to really know the area and the people.  And the last meeting, held at the Tenants Hall of Brenchley Gardens (so right on the edge of the geographical area), was held with one day's notice.  Not good.
    • Friends of Peckham Rye Park sent emails to its members (do join if you can; it's useful) saying a few nights ago a fire was started on the SE22 side of the park by kids with fireworks.  Horrific.  
    • No One Said It  Was  However spending money you haven't got and increasing national debt is not a great way to run a country now is it ? Or has common sense left you 🤔 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...