Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is an interesting BBC News report concerning the numbers of drivers caught on the phone not using a hands free kit.


It does beg me to ask the question of why, whenever I see a driver on a hand held phone, they are 90% of the time in expensive or flashy cars. I wonder if they have spent so much in buying their pride and joy, that they can't then also afford a simple hands free kit (bluetooth or wired) to go with their car.


Speculation I guess but frustrating to see when I flash past them at 70 mph down Barry Road (6)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3186-mobile-phones-and-drivers/
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> arrogance is my suspicion


That too I think plays a large factor in it as well... and simply believing the law doesn't apply to them may well factor into it...


Good luck with your plans to get 'knocked over' but remember most of them drive big 4*4's but have no control over them so they may well feel a small bump and believe they have (yet again) run over a curb, cat, dog, local wildlife, local MP or something... ::o

I'm not sure that the type of car has anything to do with it, more the type of driver. Big flashy cars tend to have voice activated hands free systems built in. However, I think at least 99% of people that own a mob and a car have at some point used it manually in the car, even if it was just to say "I'm driving, I'll call you back later." Controversially I'm sure there's also a small minority of drivers who are quite capable of driving a car and using a mob at the same time very safely.

Ms B's guide to London traffic light sequence:


Red - Stop, revving engine to encourage pedestrians to cross the road quickly; do not use handbrake as this will stop you rolling backwards and forwards like an idiot; if on a bike you may go straight ahead, swearing at all comers

Red + amber - go, spinning wheels and burning rubber

Green - go

Amber - accelerate

Just turning red - accelerate, staring straight ahead; if driving a bus or taxi, you have right of way.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ms B's guide to London traffic light sequence:

>

> Red - Stop, revving engine to encourage

> pedestrians to cross the road quickly; do not use

> handbrake as this will stop you rolling backwards

> and forwards like an idiot; if on a bike you may

> go straight ahead, swearing at all comers

> Red + amber - go, spinning wheels and burning

> rubber

> Green - go

> Amber - accelerate

> Just turning red - accelerate, staring straight

> ahead; if driving a bus or taxi, you have right of

> way.


not bad, but you forgot the special rules for pedestrians:


green man: walk into road - mobile phone/ipod optional

red man: walk into road with mobile phone clamped firmly to right ear - do not under any circumstances look in the direction of oncoming traffic - swear furiously at anyone who alerts you to their presence

absence of traffic signals: see rule for red man

Blinder999, you're right - I saw a guy cross the road just this morning yakking on his phone and swearing at the driver who was obliged to brake sharply to avoid hitting him.


Maybe Boris will grant Londoners the power to make a citizen's arrest when you see someone blatantly using their phone while driving. Actually, he probably would.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...