Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Charles Martel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > pikey, gypo, need I go on?...hardly 'well put'

>

> You are making an inference that was not intended.

> Pikeys in my mind are not Gypsies in any sense.

> Gypsies are an ethnic group with distinct

> language, history and culture. You do not become

> one simply by living in a caravan, any more than

> you would become a Native American by buying a

> wigwam.


I waan't inferring that pikey was an alternative term for a Gypsy. I'm fully aware that pikey and Gypsy are different. Pikey is a derogatory term for a traveller. You or I could become travellers, whereas we couldn;t become Gypises for the reason you correctly explained. I was referring to derogatory terms in general. I could've addeed many more examples. You threw in the term thinking it would somehow reinforce your alarmist rhetoric. It didn't. Therefore IMO it wasn't a 'well put' argument...

Agree with that. L-shaped extensions aren't always bad news either. It really depends so I wasn't trying to tar anyone who wants one as inconsiderate. Ground floor extensions (not properly executed) are the most likely source of loss of light. However, I do think planning are pretty quick to insist people scale down their plans. Also, material loss of light is a legal issue, not a planning one. Based on Right to Light you can sue for damages even if the planning authorities granted you planning permission.



Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not all lofts are high enough to convert into a

> useable room, so building over the back is a good

> way of adding an extra bedroom. Although saying

> that, if the neighbours object then you have to

> make a judgement on whether you consider your

> extra space to be more important than the wishes

> of the neighbours.

>

> I have no sympathy for someone who just builds the

> biggest extension they can to raise the value of

> the house, but I can understand people trying to

> create the space they need for their family within

> their budget. The people saying "if you don't have

> enough space buy a bigger house" obviously haven't

> looked at property prices recently.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Pikey is a derogatory term

> > for a traveller.

>

> Who are the group that travellers call pikeys?

>

> John K



No idea John. How about white trash, or maybe chavs...bring back fuzzy wuzzies I say, life was so much simpler then...

First mate and moonlaunch,

I just read some of your comments about 'want' and 'need' of extra rooms in loft conversions and extended 'outriggers' (back extensions?)- yes, maybe buy a bigger house instead.


The other big issue is the amount of noise and disruption that neighbours have to put up so these 'lofty ideas'(geddit)can be carried out. Anyone on this thread getting ready for their Grand Designs to go ahead (after getting the Party Wall Agreement signed off, of course, should take a look at the all the vans, concrete mixers, pallets, girders, slurry on the roads and pavements and constant deliveries that go on when the work is carried out. Also, pop into your neighbours house sometime when the guys are drilling out the party wall and have a listen to the noise.

But, at the end of the day though, it's all worth it for YOU though.


Pip, Pip.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How long does it take to channel out the party

> wall to insert the beams? Should only be 1-2 days.


Most beams used for loft extensions sit perpendicular to the party wall(s). And it doesn't have to be excessively noisy to put one in. Carefully remove inner skin of bricks (by hand), form concrete padstone to rest beam on, make good.

A beam used to support a chimney breast that has been removed, will run parallel to the party wall, usually sitting adjacent to the wall, bearing on internal/external walls inside the owners property. Excessive noise tends to be generated by other activities...

Yes, like builders talking loudly and playing music early in the morning...


But seriously, any home improvement you do will be noisy and disruptive. This isn't unique to loft conversions (which have existed for decades) or side returns. Unless you are saying homes should never have worked carried out on them, the point you are trying to make isn't really valid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...