Jump to content

Recommended vet for cat amputation?


Recommended Posts

Hi there,


Our cat has been in an accident and is currently in Streatham Hill Emnergency Vet surgery. He needs his back leg amputated and they are saying they can perform the procedure, but I would rather do some research and find the best vet in South-East London to do it.


Could anyone recommend an orthopedic vet for a cat amputation? I would be so grateful for any suggestions as soon as possible. The surgery needs to be done today.


Thanks

Thank you for all the kind suggestions. We were highly recommended Fitzpatrick Referrals Vet & Animal Hospital in Godalming, Surrey. They were able to offer surgery to repair the broken leg for a little more than the cost of amputation. We have been very impressed with their professionalism and level of knowledge so far.

Just to clarify, we took our cat initially to the South London Emergency Veterinary Centre on Streatham High Road, not Streatham Vets.


Markus and the team at the Emergency Centre did a brilliant job advising us on the different options open to us, which were severely restricted because of the Bank Holiday. Markus referred us to an orthopaedic vet surgery that was able to save our cats leg, and he's now on the way to making a full recovery.


We are very grateful to the South London Emergency Veterinary Centre for their help and support, and would definitely recommend them to anyone who needed emergency / out of hours Vet support.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...