Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Using cabs is not the same as owning cars and clogging up the roads. My issue is with individual car ownership and the additional problems that causes.


Cabs are similar to using shared cars in a car club, each journey obviously produces pollution and CO2, but less cars are needed, less parking space is required and people are less likely to make local trips in a cab which could more easily be done on foot or by bike.


It's still not green, but it can be included as part of the move towards a more sustainable transport model.

DJKQ - just for the record, you state above:


And yes....I don't know a single person who works on location in the film industry or TV drama that doesn't own a car, or motorbike.


and


Actors are always collected by private hire cars.


So I'm kind of confused, does everyone own a car/motorbike or not?


And what's wrong with motorbikes? It's individual car ownership that I have been saying is unsustainable.

What jumps out at me is the idea that someone doing their job is being portrayed as evil because the event was for Charidee. Sorry but that doesn't exempt the OP from the law and you shouldn't point fingers just because you feel you are morally superior. That's how I read it.


And another echo for BR and Renata, I'm sure I'm not the only one who finds it a bit ironic that you should feel the need to drive in order to run.

Hi LadyD, thanks for your responses. Firstly, apologies for my rather unnecessary and provocative post. Let's not let this descend into an argumentum ad hominem...


I'm not talking about large families who live in Ethiopia, I'm talking about large families who live in London. I appreciate you must live in an environmentally conscious way and that's obviously to your credit, however your legacy will still leave a larger carbon footprint than mine by virtue of the fact that you are a grandmother and I don't have kids, even though I drive a (second hand) car. Do any of your kids have cars? Catch flights abroad? Will your grandkids drive? Will their kids? etc.


The point is, no one would deny you the happiness and pride that your family must bring you. Similarly, I believe it would be wrong to deny people their independance and livelihoods through banning car ownership in London. I look forward to the weekends when I can jump in my car, drive to the countryside and visit my friends, family and relatives. On top of that, I simply couldn't do my chosen profession without my car.

Willard, thanks for the olive branch!


The problems with individual car ownership is about more than just the carbon footprint. It's also about congestion; pollution; the inherent danger to cyclists, pedestrians, other drivers etc.; the health problems associated with reduced levels of exercise and stress from driving through congested roads; loss of amenity due to increased need for wider roads and parking spaces etc.


There are lots of negative aspects to individual car ownership that are not just borne by the car owner and I feel it is unfair for the rest of society to have to suffer these negative by-products of individual car ownership for other people's convenience.


In relation to each of our carbon footprints, only my son owns a car. He has a small car which he uses to transport his large amount of taekwondo equipment to his classes otherwise he cycles every day to his job in Elephant & Castle. He is hoping to buy a second hand electric vehicle at some point because I keep nagging him.


The rest of my descendants cycle, walk and use public transport. They also get much of their stuff from charity shops/Freecycle. As for flights, in the past 10 years there have been 6 flights in total between all of us and only one was long haul, to Jamaica to visit family.


I would like to ask you a few questions if you don?t mind. Not wanting to play the 'i'm greener than you' game, but you did start it!


Do you have electronic/electric gadgets in your house? Do you use a tumble dryer or dishwasher?


How many flights have you been on in the past 10 years?


Do you upgrade your electronics when the old ones still work? Do you buy your clothes/furniture etc new or second hand? Do you pass on your unwanted goods to others/recycle them or throw them away?


Do you make journeys of under a mile in your car? If so, how often?

lady d, you really are a total tosser. obsessed, closed minded, delighting in your ability to anger and provoke all those around you. a period of humble silence would be welcome. forum authorities should consider suspending you and your spite

puzzled Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> lady d, you really are a total tosser. obsessed,

> closed minded, delighting in your ability to anger

> and provoke all those around you. a period of

> humble silence would be welcome. forum authorities

> should consider suspending you and your spite



And breathe .....

SIGH.....hire cars are used to transport principle actors to guarantee they arrive, and arrive in comfort and on time (if hire cars and drivers were not used they would have to use their own vehicles). Ordinary cabs are not used. Specialist car companies and drivers are used. Technicians, crew and other cast (not priciple) use their own vehicles, and yes some use motorbikes but not everyone is capable of riding a motorbike (nor wants too in cold, wind and rain)...........there are no holes to pick in this guys...really.......

Most of us have nowhere to grow anything LD let alone keet chickens....you need to cut some slack here. Even if everyone wanted to be totally eco aware, they can't be.


I only use my vehicle for work or for transporting stock for my Tenants Hall. I make all journeys that I can by bicycle (mainly because of the money it saves me). I make a lot of journeys by public transport too. When I do get on my bicycle or in my vehicle I always have in mind the opening words of the highway code - 'to avoid an accident if you can'. I don't consider myself to be inconsiderate of the environment nor do I believe I am putting anyones life in danger. I've never hit a pedestrian with any motor vehicle I've ever owned. I have though had several collisions on my bicycle with pedestrians that walked out in front of me (pedrestrian percesption being - bicycle equals slow and can stop immiediately).....


Things have to be looked at in perspective.

DJKQ - Willard wanted to know whether I have a higher or lower carbon footprint than him, so I decided to bore you all with my efforts to live a greener life over the past decade. Sorry to be a tw@t, but I feel I was left with no choice on the matter!

It was never about point scoring Deliah, it was about exposing the hypocrisy of a self proclaimed Eco warrior. Surely even a lawyer can work out that I will consume less in my finite life time than you and your ever expanding lineage and progeny who's consumption will increase exponentially.


And as for your ?54 pound gas bill, well that's just cheating because everyone knows that grannies get a heating allowance ;-)


No further questions m'Lud.

I went to a charity evening in Honor Oak this week along with quite a few others who had travellend by car (terrible rain). I had to park on the main road, rememberign this thread, I didn't half park on the pavement. As I was walking away, the resulting narrowness of the road meant that with two buses approaching from either direction, there was a massive hold up, traffic jam, hotting, beeping and general commotion...


Would it have been better and mroe community-minded to put half my car on the pavement. I think, yes - so long as there was enough room for buggies and wheelchairs to pass. But I didn't, and was the cause of a major traffic incident.

There are reasons for laws, even if we can't immediately

see them.


That's what I get told anyway :)


treehugger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I went to a charity evening in Honor Oak this week

> along with quite a few others who had travellend

> by car (terrible rain). I had to park on the main

> road, rememberign this thread, I didn't half park

> on the pavement. As I was walking away, the

> resulting narrowness of the road meant that with

> two buses approaching from either direction, there

> was a massive hold up, traffic jam, hotting,

> beeping and general commotion...

>

> Would it have been better and mroe

> community-minded to put half my car on the

> pavement. I think, yes - so long as there was

> enough room for buggies and wheelchairs to pass.

> But I didn't, and was the cause of a major traffic

> incident.

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...