Jump to content
Visit out new Tradespeople Directory! ×

Estate Agent Recommendation - No Flies

mrsbee

By mrsbee
in Request a Tradesperson

Recommended Posts

mrsbee

mrsbee

Posted
Posted

I would like to recommend a new estate agent ? No Flies.


They have recently set up in the area and I have just sold my flat with them.


They are internet based so have no ?shop? to visit however this made no difference at all to the service they provided.


The brochure was very professional and contained more information than the standard estate agent?s leaflet and the photos were great too.


Communication was excellent throughout the whole process. Viewings were arranged at convenient times and plenty of notice was given (ideal with 3 small children).


We had offers within a week and they went thought them all in details giving balanced advice.


If you are thinking of selling I would highly recommend contacting them ? good value for money as well.


Check out the website www.no-flies.co.uk


If you have any questions feel free to PM me.

  • 4 months later...
mrsbee

mrsbee

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just wanted to give an update on No Flies. We have finally exchanged and although it has taken a while I have to say that the service from Brendan and Tony has been fantastic (something I never thought I would ever say that about an estate agent).


The flat was sold in a week and since then Brendan has made the process easy. He dealt with the buyers, solicitors and theother estate agents at all stages. Always using his own initiative and coming up with solutions to any issues that arose. I wish I could say the same for the other estate agents we had to deal with.


If you're thinking of selling I would highly recommend No Flies - don't let the fact that they are only internet based put you off, they are definitely more than a website. The service they provide is better than other agents I've dealt with and cheaper.


Do PM me if you want to know anything else.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • HeadNun
      Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • Sephiroth
      Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?

      By Sephiroth · Posted

      judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • HeadNun
      Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • CPR Dave
      Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...