Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’d prefer the UK to be a republic, so not interested.


However, if those who feel differently want to celebrate then it doesn’t bother me. That said, it’s 2023 not 1953 so shifting all the parked cars around here would be quite the feat!

For those wanting to join into the spirit of the occasion, the deadline for applying is 28 February and fast approaching.


https://www.southwark.gov.uk/events-culture-and-heritage/events/planning-an-event/street-parties

 

That was well publicised by the council 🙈

I don't have strong feelings either way but, yes, the bias is plain for all to see, especially when we consider the rationale for extending Gala in the park to a month has been built around the narrative of the Council's really strong desire to fund free community events.


It will be fascinating to see which ' community' events they push and which not.

I'm interested to hear if CPR Dave is organising anything for Crystal Palace Rd or anywhere else.

Its a once in a generation event (hopefully)

Aside from abdication, it is pretty much a once in a generation event by definition...

A generation is generally taken as 30 years. That means that on average people might expect at least 2 and possibly 3 coronations in their lifetime. This will be my second. I'm the same age (give or take) as the King so it will be a toss up whether he or I pegs out first.

Crystal Palace Road is a major through route so doubt permission would be granted tbh. We've never had a street party before.

 

There have been several street parties in Crystal Palace Road.


The part of the road between The Actress and what is now The Great Exhibition was closed, with no problem getting council permission.


On one occasion the CPR party combined with Ulverscroft Road.


My partner and I ran the live music for the CPR parties, and once for Ulverscroft Road.


They only stopped because some of the people involved in organising them moved out of the area, and nobody else was interested in helping.


The remaining organisers, including us, felt it was too much work for just a few people.


I don't think any of them were connected with royal events. We were conveniently out of London for those 🤣

  • 1 month later...

Saturday street parties:

  • Derwent Grove, East Dulwich, 12 pm – 8:30 pm (Whole road)
  • Desenfans Road, Dulwich, 8 am – 9 pm (Whole road)

Sunday street parties:

  • Chesterfield Grove, East Dulwich, 10 am – 6 pm (Whole road)
  • Cornflower Terrace, East Dulwich, 12 pm – 5 pm (Whole road)
  • Crystal Palace Road, East Dulwich, 12 pm – 6 pm (Crystal Palace Road intersection with Silvester Road and Underhill Road)
  • Crystal Palace Road, East Dulwich, 11 am – 8:30 pm (From Landcroft Road to Thomson Road)
  • Dovedale Road, East Dulwich, 10:30 am – 8:30 pm (From 2A Dovedale Road to the junction with Mundania Road)
  • Druce Road, Dulwich, 9 am – 8:30 pm (Whole road)
  • Dunstans Road, East Dulwich, 9 am – 8:30 pm (Between Crebor Street and Goodrich Road)
  • Dunstan’s Grove, East Dulwich,  12 pm – 8:30 pm (Whole road) 
  • Goodrich Road, East Dulwich, 12 pm – 6 pm (From Landcroft Road to Crystal Palace Road)
  • Henslowe Road, East Dulwich, 2 pm – 8:30 pm (From 1-45 Henslowe Road)
  • Landells Road, East Dulwich, 11 am – 8 pm (Between Sylvester Road to Crystal Palace Road)
  • Pickwick Road, Dulwich, 7 am – 8:30 pm (From Dulwich Village to Turney Road)
  • St Aidans Road, East Dulwich, 12 pm – 7 pm (From the top junction with Underhill Road to the Herne Tavern)
  • Upland Road, East Dulwich, 12 pm – 8:30 pm (From 115-145 Upland Road)
Edited by Bic Basher
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • a) Because they published a leaflet in Urdu promising to give "Muslims a strong voice". This is reprehensible - just as a party that promised to give Protestants or Jews or Buddhists alone "a strong voice" would be acting in a sectarian manner. Parties - especially socialist ones like the English & Welsh Greens are now - should not be assymetrically promoting the interests of one religious group. b) Because they published a video in Urdu and Bangla criticising Kier Starmer for meeting Narendra Modi, when Modi has nothing to do with the issues discussed. Modi is a Hindu nationalist bigot - but in this context, the Greens are just shitstirring existing tensions between British Hindus and British Muslims for the purpose of trying to win Muslim votes - see the first point. FWIW I don't have any problem with parties communicating with the electorate in languages other than English (from Irish to Polish to Malayalam). What is very suspicious is when parties pump out sectarian messages only in one language... When Mamdani ran for Mayor of NYC (and won) he released plenty of campaign videos in multiple languages - but always with English subtitles too. There was never a suggestion he was sending different, sectarian messages to different groups.     https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-greens-made-advert-urdu-164616073.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/uk-green-party-accused-of-sectarianism-after-releasing-videos-in-urdu-and-bangla-featuring-pm-modi-and-gaza/articleshow/128826689.cms  
    • @Sue the Green's campaign video showing Keir Starmer shaking hands with Modi and David Lammy shaking hands with Netanyahu is one such example.  As I say, I don't know the organisation, but I would expect election observers to only report after polls have closed. To do otherwise could be perceived as interfering in the election. They might need to check patterns across multiple polling stations. Any public criticism by an independent observer mid-poll could discourage participation and could be interpreted as campaigning. Much safer / more robust to check observations and release after the event.  Sorry - those posts merged. Not intended.   
    • Could you be more specific as to how "the Greens have practiced this on a far more significant scale in Gorton and Denton"? How exactly did they "try to exploit ethic tensions"?
    • I think the accusation derives from the Greens mobilising the Muslim vote, hence engaging in sectarian politics. But happy to be corrected    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...