Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Right o the torygraph: the mouthpiece of a government which has decided anti environmentalism is its cause celebre in its latest manufactured culture war.

Funny how so many worldly people who just claim to care so much about poorer Londoners can do little but quote right wing gutter press 🤔

 

 

Sorry chicken, I forgot you need an unbiased report to believe anything 

Try 

BBC News - Newcastle city council to axe low traffic neighbourhood
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-66694402

Funny how so many worldly people who just claim to care so much just dis certain media outlets without bothering to read the story.

To misquote the Bible, before the rooster crows today, you will deny three times that you know the truth about LTNs 

 

Well Southwark LTNs were certainly not 'designed' - one only has to look at the implementation as a Covid-19 'LTN' put in place due to Tory led emergency powers - Southwark should have followed the example of Ealing and committed  to restoring local democracy by reverting to established processes of public consultation and removing all 'emergency' LTNs.

This should have included an assessment of the impact of any proposed LTNs on traffic levels on the main residential roads in the borough, both in terms of the well-being of the residents who live on them and the impact on public transport and emergency services.

So not designed...

5 minutes ago, Spartacus said:

Ex, isn't that the problem with most LTNs 

Badly designed ? 

No.

And if they are, the point is they can be easily tweaked and the trial can continue. What was actually needed in the Newcastle one was an expansion. It covered a couple of residential streets but still allowed rat-running down others so naturally everyone kept using it as a cut through and the opportunity to enable more active travel was never realised.

1 minute ago, heartblock said:

This should have included an assessment of the impact of any proposed LTNs on traffic levels on the main residential roads in the borough, both in terms of the well-being of the residents who live on them and the impact on public transport and emergency services.

So not designed...

They were designed and emergency services are a statutory consultee.

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, Spartacus said:

It's not working so let's expand it.

I was talking about that specific case. LTNs are specific to each circumstance - the basic principle works but how each one is implemented has a big effect.

It's why the Loughborough Junction attempt a few years ago failed dramatically, because it was one tiny intervention on its own with no complementary or supporting measures.

Don't worry Ex, keep swallowing the councils shilling whilst the rest of us suffer with the LTN failures 

1 hour ago, exdulwicher said:

The basic premise is that it was badly designed - classic case of not listening to the experts

Rewinding your conversation a bit, I thought that you had been banging the drum over the past 18 months about LTNs being designed by experts and people who knew better than the ordinary person in the Street. But now you appear to be saying they aren't. 

Interesting.

38 minutes ago, Spartacus said:

Don't worry Ex, keep swallowing the councils shilling whilst the rest of us suffer with the LTN failures 

Rewinding your conversation a bit, I thought that you had been banging the drum over the past 18 months about LTNs being designed by experts and people who knew better than the ordinary person in the Street. But now you appear to be saying they aren't. 

Interesting.

I'm talking about that specific case of the Newcastle one. 

It doesn't mean that all LTNs are bad or badly designed, we're referring to that specific one linked to in the news articles previously. 

Ah I see, and you also cited the Loughborough Junction attempt, maybe that wasn't designed by your expert too. What about the Wandsworth ones, again not designed by an expert? 

I'm smelling a pattern. 

Maybe, gulp, none of them have been designed by an expert because they were implemented in a hurry by council officers who hadn't implemented one before. 

  • Like 3

An emergency road closure is not design... 

When main residential roads and Red Routes controlled by TFL which carry over 30 per cent of all traffic, have more traffic deliberately forced onto them, the increased congestion and delay for local people is an issue. Naïve polling that points to big majorities favouring LTNs never ask follow-up questions about resulting congestion and delay.

Perhaps most significantly for long-standing Labour supporters, which I used to be - is that Southwark ignored the reality that LTNs primarily displace traffic from the roads of the prosperous to the roads of the poorer and more disadvantaged residents, consider the South Circular and Lordship Lane which already suffer from high levels of air pollution. The additional congestion and stalled traffic offer no alleviation. It is a policy that goes against all the principles of social justice.

 

Edited by heartblock
  • Like 2

Oh no another call for arms. 

The Beeb includes stories that they think will carry a bit of interest.  Whilst it should be objective based on the current news there is one on a failed LTN and none on successful traffic reduction schemes.   Therefore the Beeb is totally against LTNs.  I also see that they are fully in support of criminalising nitrous oxide use, carrying the government's line without any broader discussion on the downsides (in harm terms it's relatively minor, 'enjoyed' by 100,000s who could now get a criminal record).  Shame there isn't more on Scotland looking to ban disposable vapes which is now well down the Beeb pecking order.

Hmm, I'm just saying that one scheme that was cancelled, heralded by the right wing rags, and picked up by the Beeb isn't a sign that all LTNs are bad and that they will all be cancelled.

Looking forward to the time when this wont be news any more, sooner rather than later so we can put our energies towards more worthy matters.

So no I don't think that there is any fight. 

 

8 minutes ago, malumbu said:

Looking forward to the time when this wont be news any more, sooner rather than later so we can put our energies towards more worthy matters.

 

So are we, when LTNs are recognised as a general failure and removed. 

Nearly 2 years on and well past bedding in time yet our local one is still having massive negative impacts on surrounding streets local buses  and the south circular despite the council tinkering and adjusting it.

Face it Mal, the Dulwich Village LTN is badly designed, a general failure and needs a radical rethink otherwise this type of discussion will roll on and on. 

The council needs to engage properly with residents to design schemes that actually work and don't alienate large swathes of voters. 

What I see is a failure is the government not tackling air quality when they were ordered by the Supreme Court to sort this ASAP in 2015

What I see if a failure is the government not doing more to persuade the masses to reduce their personal motoring for environmental and health reasons

What I see as a failure is the government not explaining to the masses that from the early 10s new emission standards were not delivering the expected reductions in roadside NO2 and gently pushing those driving in mainly urban environments to move to small petrol cars, on the understanding that diesel still made best sense for those doing long A road and motorway journeys.

What I see as a failure is the Tories not backing their own policy (ie LTNs) and worse still Starmer and Sunak now competing who can be the best friend to the motorists.

What I applaud is the local authorities trying to do something about vehicle emissions, whether they have the ideal solution or not, they are having a go. 

 

19 minutes ago, malumbu said:

What I applaud is the local authorities trying to do something about vehicle emissions, whether they have the ideal solution or not, they are having a go. 

 

If only trying was good enough, what they have implemented has caused more congestion thus increasing emissions, not reduced them.

Square that circle off if you will, but by introducing something badly they've made the situation worse.  The heralded traffic evaporation just hasn't happened so more buses, lorries and cars are getting delayed pumping out more of the toxins you so badly want to reduce.  

  • Like 2

You mean the local data that many view as flawed/incomplete and therefore worthless.

The data that when challenged on its accuracy at a meeting with One Dulwich, Cllr McAsh promised to go away and investigate and let them know the findings.

Everyone is still waiting...

8 hours ago, march46 said:

The data shows a different story, as does my lived experience.

There has been no data published for over a year from Southwark and as it did not measure congestion or traffic travelling below a certain speed (often quoted as 10-20km/hr), only registering traffic that was free-flowing with ATCs placed in incorrect areas (near junctions).

My lived experience along with residents and bus users say different, as does TFL about our bus routes on residential red routes. It is a failed experiment, poorly designed.

The BBC reported Newcastle, but there is also Ealing and Tower Hamlets where LTNs were seen as flawed and creating congestion and pollution in the poorest communities. 

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...