Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Recently the algorithms on twitter seem to have changed (okay we all know they have) and timeliness are getting filled with more blue tick paid for content, conspiracy posts (Covid was a hoax and vaccine is responsible for higher sudden deaths amongst the current ones) , anti immigration and anti woke, anti anti  everything type posts. 

Occasionally East of Dulwich makes it through but the rest of the really useful, interesting or local business tweets just aren't making it past the crud. 

Therefore I'm curious, are people still tweeting, are they just scrolling crap or are they off somewhere else ? 

It's a shame as what once was a useful (semi useful) business communication  platform seens to be vanishing up its own deranged backside. 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/328411-twitter-are-you-still-tweeting/
Share on other sites

Still using. I use Twitter mostly as a news feed for topics I’m interested in (sport, music, comedy) and it works well for that - on the Following tab I just see people I follow plus the odd promoted tweet. The For You tab is hit and miss though - it picks up some things I’m interested in, but a lot I’m not.

I’d contrast this with Facebook and Instagram, where accounts I follow are just drowned out with spam these days to the point where they’re almost unusable.

I still use it quite a bit. You can toggle between For You (algorithmic) and Following which I think just shows you the content of people you follow. 

For You definitely shows a lot of the nutters but I have taken to muting the really tiresome ones... but cripes it must be written into the contact at GB News that you need to Tweet complete tripe literally 50 times a day so that's a lot of blocking.

When I use Following, I find that some of my followees are prone to quite excessive retweeting so that causes it's own irritations. I am on the imaginative handle of @duncanwellings FYI

With the newly introduced limit on the number of tweets you can see, could this be the death throes of twitter ? 

Maybe not a bad thing as a lot of social media has become toxic over the years, maybe we all need to step back and re-engage in the real, not virtual, world 😉 to see people for who they are and not to be manipulated by algorithms that reinforce our beliefs, right or wring.

Lol one can only dream ! 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...