Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I poured frogspawn (thanks lousmith) into my tub from a jar and it sank.


I was expecting it to float back to the surface, but it hasn't and I can't see it in the tub (the tub is black so a bit hard to see things in it).


Is it OK for it not to be at or near the surface? Do I need to put my hand in, locate it and pull it up?


:-$

  • 2 weeks later...

I went away for the weekend and when I came back there was no sign of ANY of my frogspawn - it hasn't sunk to the bottom again, it has just completely disappeared.


It hasn't hatched - no sign of tadpoles.


I've just googled and apparently cats and some birds will eat it :-S


I had removed the netting over my tub - now I wish I hadn't.

  • 3 weeks later...

henryb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you sure it wasn't a Swift? They are more

> common in London or maybe a House Martin. They all

> arrive about now.


xxxxxxx


Yes, might have been, but tail seemed very long.


Will be lovely to see the swifts swooping about again.


PGC, I was about to post the same thing about the coot/moorhen thing, it is the only way I can remember which is which!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...