Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi folks. Not sure which is the right Board to post this, so here goes....


Anyone got any thoughts on a good time to sell a garden flat - in fact, is there such thing as a good time, or is that just folklore/agent bs/ completely irrelevant? I'm planning to sell mine and not sure if it matters that Spring has come and gone and now, with the best will in the world, anyone who makes me an offer won't be in before Autumn. OTOH it's big enough for a family and in a decent catchment area so I suppose that could come into play.


Just wondering if anyone has any thoughts/experiences of selling at different times of the year really. Pointless asking the agent, he just says do it yesterday!


Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/33398-when-to-sell/
Share on other sites

I would say now is a good time to sell, given what's happened to prices in South East London!


Depends also on where you're moving to I guess (if you need to sell to move), as you could sit tight in the hope that property prices continue to rise as fast as they are. This of course won't be such a good idea if you're upsizing in the same area.


Some think that we're in the middle of another property bubble that will burst so, if they're correct, now would be a good time to sell! Having bought this year, I hope that;s not the case, but worth considering.


In terms of more specifically which month / season etc, I'm not sure it will make much difference - there's still a shortage of property on the market...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/33398-when-to-sell/#findComment-655308
Share on other sites

I've sold in winter and summer, both times house went quickly, I think at least in part because I was quite realistic about pricing and didn't try to push to get a really high price.


Having said that, usual guidance is sell in spring or autumn as market slows down in summer and around Christmas/New Year.


Main thing is to show property at its best. It might be a cliche but untidy front gardens, peeling paint on front doors etc all starts to put people off before they even get in - wonder if there might be more significant less visible issues (damp / boiler about to pack up etc). If putting off sale for a while enables you to tidy up a bit (if needed) that might be worthwhile.


I've seen three houses go up for sale within 100 yards of mine in the last month or so and two are sporting "sold" signs at the moment and the other was for a while but is back on the market. The prices are much higher than I paid for mine two and a half years ago, even allowing for differences in spec (some have been extended / others not). Obviously don't know what price they went for yet, but will watch with interest as will be hoping to negotiate a better mortgage deal later in the year by arguing a reduced loan to value ratio.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/33398-when-to-sell/#findComment-655329
Share on other sites

Hi HelBel, we are, in fact, agents (www.no-flies.co.uk) but will resist the temptation to tell you to sell yesterday! In reality there is generally no best time to sell. Obviously high summer and over the Christmas period can be a bit slow but things tend to pick up quite quickly thereafter. In general the local market is very good at the moment with nice, well priced properties going under offer quickly and quite often above the market price by going to sealed bids. For a garden flat you should try to get the maximum benefit from the outside space as part of the marketing so that suggests late spring through to autumn. If it is a lower ground floor flat then, again, those times of the year that offer the best natural light are also probably optimal. However, if current market conditions continue and your property is nice then I am sure you will sell quickly at any time of year. If we can be of any assistance to you when you do decide to sell then please give us a call. Good luck. No-Flies
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/33398-when-to-sell/#findComment-655341
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But actually, replacing council housing, or more accurately adding to housing stock and doing so via expanding council estates was precisely what we should have been doing, financed by selling off old housing stock. As the population grows adding to housing built by councils is surely the right thing to do, and financing it through sales is a good model, it's the one commercial house builders follow for instance. In the end the issue is about having the right volumes of the appropriate sort of housing to meet national needs. Thatcher stopped that by forbidding councils to use sales revenues to increase housing stock. That was the error. 
    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...