Jump to content

Opposing new speed bumps?


Recommended Posts

Hello


Has anyone had experience in opposing the Council's plans to put in new speed bumps on their road in East Dulwich? We hope to convince the Council not to put in a full speed bump on our small road for various reasons, but not least because it simply isn't needed and isn't wanted by many of the residents. We just wondered if anyone has any help or experiences to share?


Thank you :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Andy


I appreciate that speed bumps are a useful means of slowing drivers down on some roads however they are not necessary or appropriate in all cases. We live on a very short and quiet road where a driver would have difficulty reaching 30mph let along 60mph. Some of the residents, including some who have children themselves, do not support the Council's decision to put a full width speed bump at one end of our road. Some of us feel that the speed bump would cause more problems for the residents of our road than it would solve which is why I asked my original question.


Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're clumsy devices that arguably don't work on the real problem - motorists who charge over them: drivers of company cars and especially vans; stolen or uninsured cars; un-MOTd cars and worst of all: bin lorries; so they're not a solution if your aim is to stop speeders.


And they cause loads of pollution, as motorists grind along at high revs in 2nd gear, accelerating away after each bump.


Cyclists hate the full width ones because they wreck your wheels; they hate the cushion ones because drivers swerve without warning to straddles them. And to motorcyclists, on a dark night, in the wet, they're lethal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did the speed cushions get taken out of Colyton Road? Anyone know? They know have a speed sign warning to drive at 20 mph bt not too many people seem to bother. Southwark doesn't seem to have a cohesive policy. Some roads have cushions and some have bumps.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knomester - are you sure that it is a speed bump they are putting across the entrance to the street and not just one of the

wide ramps which brings the road up to kerb height for crossing at the corner. Therapia Road, Mundania Road and Marmora were all given them and they haven't caused any issues as far as I can see. Not like a speed bump at all because they are quite wide & flat across the top.


Cate

I think the speed bumps where taken out of Colyton Road because the heavy traffic going to the thames water project couldn't cope with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trinity, thanks for explanation. It probably means that the noise was too much for residents I guess. According to research the illuminated speed signs are supposed to work better than speed bumps. I have notice that not too many people in this country seem to pay too much attention to speed limits anyway. Especially the 20mph limit in the side roads, which I totally agree with.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But you don't think the same protection should be afforded to those on the anti-LTN side...? Given the witch hunt some are be conducting to unearth which local residents are involved (see numerous examples on this forum), given the vandalism of the anti-LTN signs and interference with cars, labelling of anyone who opposes as some sort of petrol-head facist and given even Anna Goodman's tearing down of an anti-LTN poster you still think you only want anonimyity for those on one side of the argument? Does that not seem slightly hypocritical...it's why your first post on this issue entertained so many of us - it seemed ever so one-sided and summed up the challenges anyone who opposes the measures has to fight?
    • Hello again, Rubie, my cat, is still missing. He has been gone since 18th April.  Rubie is black and white, with black ears, a splendid white moustache, white front paws, and mostly white back legs.  Please check your sheds etc as he may be trapped, he’s a curious little thing.  I would really appreciate any help and suggestions. Thank you.
    • There is no equivalence between One Dulwich purporting to be a local organisation speaking for local people, and actually properly constituted organisations such as The Dulwich Society. A 3 -second google search reveals the openly published names of the trustees of Dulwich Society, so I can make my own mind up as to whether these individuals are coming at local issues with a particular slant. I can read minutes of their meetings online, and whilst I might not agree with their every position, I can have confidence that they are an open and fundamentally democratic institution. There is absolutely nothing similar in terms of publicly accountable information to be found about One Dulwich - no idea of who is behind it, who pays for it ( it is clearly expensive), and on what basis they make their decisions.  Given the Police involvement in the intimidation of people with a public pro-LTN view ( for which there is no equivalence in terms of severity of any incident for those with an anti-LTN point of view), I can fully understand why, for Dulwich Society's traffic sub- committee only, they want a bit of online anonymity. I also find it slightly disturbing that when The Dulwich Society current leadership asked the 'grouping' pushing for changes within it for a meeting to discuss their concerns, they refused it. Given the recent experiences of organisations such as The National Trust, the question can be asked - is something similar going on here?   
    • I’ll post it to the DVLA if i don’t find the owner by midweek. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...