Jump to content

Franks


Recommended Posts

Yes, it's all true. My mum's neighbour said that his friend's daughter overheard a bloke in a pub somewhere talking about a secret cabal of local politicians internationally-famous sculptors who had used their "Special Powers" to block Waitrose's plans for a fancy supermarket on the 10th floor of that Peckham car park. Prime real estate it is...


You might laugh, but it's got to be true. Or a made-up "rumour".


UncleBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rumour does not equal fact. Learn to read ld!

> Maybe the local politicians were influenced by

> celebrity status, yes think that was it. However

> point still stands-no others use the carpark. . .

Well why if the venue is so fantastic, the views so amazing that the location is not used by anyone else, and why don't/can't other money makers want to try the venue?


Maybe because 6 years ago everyone thought she (and the rest of the group involved, not just her) were insane to try and revitalise a multi story car park into a local art gallery/sculpture show space with a small bar on top. The site is so much more than just Franks. Or are you suggesting, now she's made the car park/arts space a success, the leaseholder should throw her out and run Franks as a high end commercial enterprise? If so, that rather misses the point of what the whole project is about.


Edited to make tags work...

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well why if the venue is so fantastic, the views

> so amazing that the location is not used by anyone

> else, and why don't/can't other money makers want

> to try the venue?

>

> Maybe because 6 years ago everyone thought she

> (and the rest of the group involved, not just her)

> were insane to try and revitalise a multi story

> car park into a local art gallery/sculpture show

> space with a small bar on top. The site is so

> much more than just Franks. Or are you

> suggesting, now she's made the car park/arts space

> a success, the leaseholder should throw her out

> and run Franks as a high end commercial

> enterprise? If so, that rather misses the point of

> what the whole project is about.

>

> Edited to make tags work...




Well said!


I've been going for the last 3 years and every year there are great new details, I especially like the new railway sleeper seats and planting scheme this year, also the bar on the level below is pretty cool. Just don't go on a mad hot day on Friday or saturday night. Saturday or Sunday late afternoon early evening is perfect, straight in, get a drink, soak up the view, sunshine and atmosphere and have a nice experience, then pop off somewhere else after. Job done!

It's noticeably busier than it has been in previous years but don't be put off by that too much as the crowd is spread out over a wider area than it used to be (not penned into one corner of the rooftop like before). Also, there's now more than one bar at busiest times so you can dodge the giant queue at the main bar if you'll settle for wine or beer instead of a cocktail or spirits. Your main obstacle is getting in to start off with, though if you time it right then you can avoid the queue.


The main difference this year is the arrival of the Overground extension to Peckham Rye that makes it easier than ever before to get to this part of town - and for us to get to other areas too, of course. The great thing about living locally is that we all have a head start on people travelling in from elsewhere so take advantage of that and get in first.

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...