Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Let me know who's up for a World Cup Predictor game.

I think it will be based on the Champions League format, whereby all players make predictions for the group matches, and the leading 8 or 16 players (depending on how many players) will then go on to the head to head format...

Here we go, the final fixtures for the season, best of luck to everyone with a mathematical chance of winning...



Sunday 11th May 2014


Cardiff v Chelsea

Fulham v Crystal Palace

Hull v Everton

Liverpool v Newcastle

Man City v West Ham

Norwich v Arsenal

Southampton v Man Utd

Sunderland v Swansea

Tottenham v Aston Villa

West Brom v Stoke

Congratulations RC. Your correct score predictions were amazing.


http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-gen014.gif


Really pleased to have finished in 3rd place at first attempt.


Towards the end, I was just trying to stay ahead of you RD! :)


Thanks for organising this. It's been brill x

I agree that head to heads are more fun, and in keeping with the format of a cup competition, whereas PredictAddict's format for the World Cup is based on a league system. Doing both would work, use PA to submit predictions for the group matches, and then do our own head to heads in the last 16 or 8, depending on how many people join in. At the moment only yourself and LadyG have said yes, so I'm loathe to set anything up until we get at least a dozen takers, or else the head to heads just won't work...

The EDF Cup Final 2014...


starring El Pibe and maxxi.


PM me your predictions before kick off for Arsenal v Hull (score at 90mins).

If both players predict the same result without getting the correct score, the player with the prediction nearest to the actual score will win...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...