Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can I politely request that people with dogs follow the leash laws in Dulwich Park and keep their dogs on a lead in the required areas. Before anyone calls me a Karen, dogs have the entire perimeter of the park to be off the lead, there’s just small areas that require them to be on a short lead. My puppy has now been attacked and bitten twice by off lead dogs in these areas in the space of 4 days. I walk him in those areas specifically to avoid dogs that will run up while I’m trying to train with him, but it’s happening anyway because people can’t follow simple rules. 

Edited by Administrator
Edited title to match post
  • Like 1
  • Agree 3
1 minute ago, malumbu said:

Assuming from the title this is a general discussion on the park.  Always liked it. Great for cycling including London recumbents.  Kids played there when younger.  Never been fond of cafe, others may disagree.

Perhaps the OP needs to make the title more specific, to avoid the serious issue in question being taken over by other stuff unconnected with it?

  • Administrator changed the title to Leash Laws not being obeyed in Dulwich Park

Really sorry tohear this - incredibly unlucky and very unusual for both Dulwich and Peckham parks. (I have been a dog owner 12 years and never had any experience of this) what sorts of dogs were they? I’m assuming not the same each time - and did you see the owners? I wonder if there is someone new to the area - will def keep an eye out going forward . I do hope your pup is ok. 

Edited by tiddles

Sorry hear about your puppy. Sadly this is just the norm in all the parks and open spaces round here. Dogs off leash in areas signed as on leash only, and owners letting their dogs run pretty wild with no evident power of recall in the other areas.

  • Agree 3

I once had an idiot unleash his dog on the pavement on LL, near Goose Green (so extremely close to  traffic)  to let it rush at my dog who was sedately walking next to me on a lead. I was carrying a bag of shopping.  I shouted at him. He couldn’t accept it was a stupid and dangerous thing to do, both for my dog,  his dog and me.  He said that he and his dog were jjust being friendly.  Just one of many stories I have about dog owners without manners; common sense or critical thinking. 

On 13/06/2024 at 15:41, malumbu said:

Assuming from the title this is a general discussion on the park.  Always liked it. Great for cycling including London recumbents.  Kids played there when younger.  Never been fond of cafe, others may disagree.

Title states " Leash Laws not being obeyed in Dulwich Park" .....think it isn’t a general discussion on the park. 

Original title was 'Dulwich Park'.  Always worth saying what the thread's intention is rather than leaving it vague or general in the title.  Apart from the general irrational moan thread on the Lounge which was great fun.

Edited by malumbu
On 24/06/2024 at 15:08, malumbu said:

Original title was 'Dulwich Park'.  Always worth saying what the thread's intention is rather than leaving it vague or general in the title.  Apart from the general irrational moan thread on the Lounge which was great fun.

Maybe some constructive help like Sue's reply would have been more appropriate, rather than your unpleasantly smarmy comment. Although the original thread title was vague, the first post introduced the thread quite clearly. Bet you felt quite pleased with yourself after your first reply 🤡

 

On 13/06/2024 at 16:28, Angelina said:

Dog walkers should not have the dog off lead unless they have full recall control, regardless of park rules

There's an increasing problem with some dog owners thinking they don't need to control their dogs and it's become worse since the pandemic. I recall taking my little boy to the part of Peckham Rye Park by the school for a little picnic. A Labrador-sized dog started to pester my son for his food while the owner was over the other side of the park chatting to her friends. When my son got scared and ran away, the dog chased him and my son was terrified. I called the owner over and she just laughed, saying that the dog was friendly. When I said that it's scary for a 2 year old, she got grumpy and said that I should know better than take a young kid to an area where dogs play. I didn't know at the time that that part of the park is considered to be an exercise space for dogs, and there were no dogs around when we'd sat down. I would expect any responsible owner to keep an eye on their dog and make sure that they don't harass anyone who does not welcome them. Then you get the owners who let their dogs run around in the dog-free picnic space in the park.....

Edited by ed26
  • Agree 1
15 hours ago, ed26 said:

Maybe some constructive help like Sue's reply would have been more appropriate, rather than your unpleasantly smarmy comment. Although the original thread title was vague, the first post introduced the thread quite clearly. Bet you felt quite pleased with yourself after your first reply 🤡

 

There's an increasing problem with some dog owners thinking they don't need to control their dogs and it's become worse since the pandemic. I recall taking my little boy to the part of Peckham Rye Park by the school for a little picnic. A Labrador-sized dog started to pester my son for his food while the owner was over the other side of the park chatting to her friends. When my son got scared and ran away, the dog chased him and my son was terrified. I called the owner over and she just laughed, saying that the dog was friendly. When I said that it's scary for a 2 year old, she got grumpy and said that I should know better than take a young kid to an area where dogs play. I didn't know at the time that that part of the park is considered to be an exercise space for dogs, and there were no dogs around when we'd sat down. I would expect any responsible owner to keep an eye on their dog and make sure that they don't harass anyone who does not welcome them. Then you get the owners who let their dogs run around in the dog-free picnic space in the park.....

It's always really hard at this time of year even with well-behaved dogs when so many picnic parties take over the few off-lead places that we have around Dulwich--especially in the lower field at the Horniman. My dogs often don't get any off-lead time during the day as a result. It would be great if those who manage our open spaces would put clearer signage in place in the summer.

I just asked the woman in Dulwich Park to please call her dog because her dog was bothering my dog. I was told by her, “that’s what dogs do…..my dog is perfectly fine” she laughed.

My dog was on a lead, not feeling well and was not happy being bothered.

Some people are just utterly rude

  • Like 1
27 minutes ago, Angelina said:

I just asked the woman in Dulwich Park to please call her dog because her dog was bothering my dog. I was told by her, “that’s what dogs do…..my dog is perfectly fine” she laughed.

My dog was on a lead, not feeling well and was not happy being bothered.

Some people are just utterly rude

I had the same experience yesterday with the more elderly of my two dogs. I said 'Off' in a loud voice to a small schnauzer who wouldn't leave my old girl alone, and the owner told me 'never to speak to her dog  in that way again'. Really!

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...