Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not at all interesting.  London has always been congested, certainly since Victorian times.  More fool the many motorists who continue to drive when they don't need to, refuse to have more than one in the car etc.  Fortunately for many journeys cycling is a quicker alternative.  It's a shame that many only post on 'bad news' stories.  I enjoyed Will Norman's Twitter feed as it was full of good stories.

 

Edited by malumbu
  • Like 1

Malumbu - your blatant and deliberate diversionary tactics to try and stop discussion on things you don't agree with is getting beyond a joke. Admin - I thought people were being told not to do this?

 

P.S. Malumbu - are you suggesting that Adam Tranter stepping down is a good thing - had he upset you somehow?

 

Returning to the subject in hand the fact that some "laugh" at the story (one can only presume they think it is funny that London is the most congested city in Europe as if it is something to aspire to) and the fact others say it is not interesting very aptly demonstrates the head-in-the-sand and blinkered attitude some have.

More congestion means more pollution - and that is bad news for all of us, surely something not to "laugh" at.

  • Agree 1

I've been thinking of my right to reply.  I try to avoid personal comments.  On this occasion the reference to Admin comes across as "I will tell teacher of you".  Rather than a grown up discussion.  Scroll to the sixth paragraph if you want to read my salient point rather than me going on and on.

Much of what is posted on this part of the forum is due to issues over LTNs, ULEZ, CPZs and other means to reduce vehicles.  I am general support.  Others of course will differ in their opinion.

Smarter driving is relevant to the whole congestion discussion.  As the London population increases and road space decreases we need to consider the use of our motor vehicles differently.  Do I need to make this journey, are there better alternatives in terms of the environment?  Could I share that journey with others?  On line shopping vs in store, and on the former do we buy too much to then return?  Cycling is relevant as for many this provides a good alternative, particularly for shorter journeys.  I'm not a fair weather cyclists, but understand that many do not want to cycle in the cold and wet, so of course there are limitations.  Much has been done to make cycling safer. I'd love universal secure street parking with CCTV when I am out and about but that isn't going to happen soon

Roads are clearer on a Monday and Friday as many more work at home.  There is less congestion over school holidays as less people driving their kids to school, and perhaps more taking time off work.   I believe we need to focus on reducing demand, and will continue to lobby my politicians to do this.  But driving is a habit that can be hard to break.  It provides convenience for many, but is this always to the wider good?  Softer measures and nudge have limited effects and we all know of people who hate public transport no matter how good we make it.

You appear to be of the view that it is reducing road space, and inconveniencing drivers, that is the issue, and this spills into vitriol about cyclists and Southwark Council .

[The 6th paragaph!] I've made my points numerous times over the years.  I've worked in transport for a decade or more so passionate about much of what I post about.  You have similarly posted numerous times with your arguments, where you feel very strongly.  I expect that many people are bored of our posts.  I'll now take a break from this and similar threads.  There is plenty that worries me in the world, Putin, Trump, climate change, so I will focus my attentions on this.

I posted what I thought was Will Noman's Twitter feed, which when I looked earlier was full of positive views.  As I am not sure whether I posted this, rather than some discussion that I know nothing about, I have deleted it.

 

 

19 minutes ago, malumbu said:

I've been thinking of my right to reply.  I try to avoid personal comments.  On this occasion the reference to Admin comes across as "I will tell teacher of you".  Rather than a grown up discussion. 

Malumbu, admin has warned you about these diversionary tactics before which led to you being restricted from some threads that were related to East Dulwich and they warned you that if you tried to derail threads you would be banned from more.

You can thank me later for drawing your attention to the fact that admin is watching your posts as you may have just saved yourself from a ban with your post-derail put it back on the rails post! 😉

 

One thing that was interesting was that in the full Inrix report it showed that they estimate the average car commute in London was 7 miles - as someone who regularly cycled 10 miles to work and then 10 miles back I can tell you it is not easy - and maybe those distances shed some light on why the nudge tactics of restricting roadspace for cars are clearly not working as many London commuters cannot switch to other modes to make their journeys. This might also explain why cycling is struggling to break out of low single figure percentages for daily journeys in London compared to other modes.

@Rockets did you say that the average commute by car was 7 miles? 

Doesn't that put in to perspective all those who have been banging on for ages that most car journeys are less rhan 3km ? 

Obviously there is a happy medium figure but to simply say "ban all cars because on average journeys are within walking or cycling distances" is clearly misleading. 

London is congested, some people like to cycle and some people need to drive. There needs to be provisions made for both otherwise London will grind to a halt. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Simply, give us a snap election now as the last 12 months in office honestly have not been great in any sense. Let someone else have a go at turning around UK plc before it's too late. At least the last administration had the inflation and unemployment rates going in the right direction at the END. 
    • Yes but what's the answer, Jazzer? No government can simply walk in and fix the economy - get the bills down, grow it and reduce debt. There is no silver bullet. The public (and the press) wants everything now, everything cheaper, but with better public services and lower taxes.  In the radio and paper, all you ever hear is pundits, MPs, think tanks and economists saying what won't work, but no one seems to know what will work.  I'm genuinely interested to hear what other views people have on here, and what they think will help, or make things worse. 
    • While they struggle with economics of UK plc, collectively we all suffer as a result of their ineptitude. 
    • I’ve tried to find details of surgeries being held before but not found any. The section of the Southwark website that details councillors’ surgeries says that: Your locally elected Councillors will be holding a roving surgery programme in the Dulwich Hill area to enable residents to raise any local issues. Residents will be notified by letter in advance of the date, time and specific streets/roads where the surgery will take place.  Surgeries are not held in August, on Bank Holidays, Easter or in Christmas Week.  Dulwich Hill Ward Councillors I’ve never seen any notification of surgeries being held, including on the DH councillors’ social media accounts. I don’t know if any other residents of Dulwich Hill have? Neighbouring wards all seem to have times and places posted for surgeries.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...