Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That's my ? I still find it very odd that there are armed policemen round the corner from my house.


If the prime minister and the chancellor need the umpteen levels of security provided for Downing St, what is the Home Secretary, who I would have idly imagined, may be more at risk than the Chancellor (from terrorists, not the British public in general), doing living in a bog standard house with an 6ft deep "front garden" on a grotty road in our neck of the woods? Doesn't this put the police officers unnecessarily at risk?


And what about the risk to the public, who have to walk by 18 inches away taking their kids to and from the very nearby school, going to church etc.


Even more puzzling is that sometimes the police are right at the pavement, firearms to the fore, but very often, eg this evening, they are not holding guns.


Just all rather odd. Advertising her presence in this way in such a vulnerable place looks a little as though someone is trying to make a point rather than actually put safety first?


I seem to recall, that either Norman Lamont or Geoffrey Howe, used to live on Trafalgar Avenue, which I also used to travel by twice daily, but I never saw armed police outside that house, even at the height of the IRA bombings.


What do people think of the armed police being there?

I lived in Bermondsey opposite Simon Hughes when he had to go through a period of having armed policemen outside his house. I never found it an issue and it was curiously reassuring. My daughter who was then three, was thoroughly charmed by the coppers, one of whom gave her a button that had come off his tunic. She's wanted to join the police ever since.

Going off on a tangent a bit here, but bear with me, I worked in a church in the city when the "Ring of Steel" was in place. This basically involved huge coppers with Heckler & Koch MP5 sub machine guns walking around outside. I worked in a day centre for homeless in the church and it was fooking great. If anything kicked off with the clients the old bill would send their nearest team - Hechler & Koch at the ready! Soon stopped some radgy drunk kicking off I can tell ya!


So........ if there are coppers with guns maybe they could start taking pot shots at some of nunhead and peckham's wannabee gangsters - soon sort the fookers out I reckon!

Good grief ratty you are very keen on and knowledgeable about firearms for a small furry creature. Please don't start encouraging your furry friends to go armed, they are worrying enough already.


It seems all kinds of creatures are more tolerant of seeing guns being wielded than I am.


Weren't there anarchists and angry Armenians hatching explosive plots in Nunhead a whole century ago, and sorted out by the British stiff upper lip and good sense, without a firearm in sight? (Or I may be completely wrong about that).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...