Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That's my ? I still find it very odd that there are armed policemen round the corner from my house.


If the prime minister and the chancellor need the umpteen levels of security provided for Downing St, what is the Home Secretary, who I would have idly imagined, may be more at risk than the Chancellor (from terrorists, not the British public in general), doing living in a bog standard house with an 6ft deep "front garden" on a grotty road in our neck of the woods? Doesn't this put the police officers unnecessarily at risk?


And what about the risk to the public, who have to walk by 18 inches away taking their kids to and from the very nearby school, going to church etc.


Even more puzzling is that sometimes the police are right at the pavement, firearms to the fore, but very often, eg this evening, they are not holding guns.


Just all rather odd. Advertising her presence in this way in such a vulnerable place looks a little as though someone is trying to make a point rather than actually put safety first?


I seem to recall, that either Norman Lamont or Geoffrey Howe, used to live on Trafalgar Avenue, which I also used to travel by twice daily, but I never saw armed police outside that house, even at the height of the IRA bombings.


What do people think of the armed police being there?

I lived in Bermondsey opposite Simon Hughes when he had to go through a period of having armed policemen outside his house. I never found it an issue and it was curiously reassuring. My daughter who was then three, was thoroughly charmed by the coppers, one of whom gave her a button that had come off his tunic. She's wanted to join the police ever since.

Going off on a tangent a bit here, but bear with me, I worked in a church in the city when the "Ring of Steel" was in place. This basically involved huge coppers with Heckler & Koch MP5 sub machine guns walking around outside. I worked in a day centre for homeless in the church and it was fooking great. If anything kicked off with the clients the old bill would send their nearest team - Hechler & Koch at the ready! Soon stopped some radgy drunk kicking off I can tell ya!


So........ if there are coppers with guns maybe they could start taking pot shots at some of nunhead and peckham's wannabee gangsters - soon sort the fookers out I reckon!

Good grief ratty you are very keen on and knowledgeable about firearms for a small furry creature. Please don't start encouraging your furry friends to go armed, they are worrying enough already.


It seems all kinds of creatures are more tolerant of seeing guns being wielded than I am.


Weren't there anarchists and angry Armenians hatching explosive plots in Nunhead a whole century ago, and sorted out by the British stiff upper lip and good sense, without a firearm in sight? (Or I may be completely wrong about that).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello My name is Lizzie and I work locally as a dog walker and nanny. I won’t be needed over Summer so will have full availability for a dogsitting job. I have a DBS certificate and will provide several dogsitting references as well. Please note that I can only watch your pet at your home since they are sadly not allowed in my flat! Looking forward to hear from you
    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...