Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone received a PCN despite being parked in a legitimate parking space along and adjacent to Lordship Lane shopping area? 

The most recent for me has been in the parking bay opposite Bells Bathrooms at the junction with Whateley Road.

Just trying to gauge how much work is being generated for Southwark in having to deal with challenges to incorrectly issued PCNs by overzealous parking wardens.

You're right, I've seen a number of cars slapped in that same spot in recent weeks (opposite bells bathrooms). I notice it because I live nearby... they never used to enforce it but technically not allowed to park where there are zig zag lines approaching a zebra crossing..wish they could make it more obvious as looks like a legit place to park otherwise!

You have to watch out on zig zag lines. Only parking wardens can get you for supposedly bad parking (like overshooting a space that's too small onto the pavement). Parking on zig zags is a different category. Anyone can report you to the police because it's supposedly a "safety" issue. An attack on drivers is what I call it.

 

But avoid those like the plague because there are motorist hating busybodies around Dulwich who can't wait to dob you in.

Where the parking bay has been intentionally positioned between the lines and the pavement, it is a parking bay.  That's how it was built when the crossing was put in and the pavement built out some years ago.

There are parking bays where the lines are painted into the bays and, in that case, the bays can't be used at all.  There is a bay like that in Dulwich Village.  But the one on lordship lane is not one of those.  It could be one of those if that's what Southwark wants but they would need to repaint the lines or turn the bay into a pavement. 

This ticketing in legitimate parking spaces has only started recently in ED since the recent employment of a large number of attendants on Lordship Lane. I imagine it is generating a lot of extra work in dealing with challenges given the number of people suddenly being ticketed. There is a cost to that.  I'm interested to know is that cost covered by the ticketing company or Southwark.

 

8 hours ago, raptortruckman69 said:

 

But avoid those like the plague because there are motorist hating busybodies around Dulwich who can't wait to dob you in.

I'm not fond of entitled motorists that couldn't give a cuss about other road users and the safety of people as a whole.  Do you tick that box?

I could spend my whole life dobbing people in but I have a life, although with some comments here it would be useful to have a helmet/body/dash cam. 

I've no sympathy for those who I do class as entitled and I speak from experience of someone who has penalty notices in the past, usually for not checking rather than taking the p.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...