Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yep if you say so, at least he didn't break an

> opponents leg eh? Roy Keane anyone


Oh Gawd, here we go again.

Roy Keane did not break Haaland's leg...fact.

Thierry Henry, fantastic player that he was, on that night was a cheating coont...fact.

Bringing the game into disrepute, you mean like Roy Keane, you don't get it either. Many clubs have been cheated out of a positive outcome as I've mentioned previously, just don't keep on about it. As far as I'm concerned a dodgy decision or cheating leave a bad taste for those that are on the wrong end, but ffs move on, and as for Maradona I couldn't give a flying fcuk. It's done, move on let it go.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That was fun. What a lobsided draw in the last

> 16.

> > Most peoples potential winners on one side.

> Makes

> > it interesting. If karma exists it may look

> > favourably on Ireland when they play France.

>

> Yawn...... let it go


That's my prerogative. I don't know why you are so interested in commenting about it when you are bored of the subject. We can't all be as entertaining as you.........

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Alan Medic Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > That was fun. What a lobsided draw in the

> last

> > 16.

> > > Most peoples potential winners on one side.

> > Makes

> > > it interesting. If karma exists it may look

> > > favourably on Ireland when they play France.

> >

> > Yawn...... let it go

>

> That's my prerogative. I don't know why you are so

> interested in commenting about it when you are

> bored of the subject. We can't all be as

> entertaining as you.........

True, but you can be mind numbingly dull with your karma bullshit.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How did Spurs sign Wanyama for only ?11m?

> Any chance Daniel Levy could become PM?...


I think he didn't have long left on his contract. But seems a bargain. Always surprised MU didn't try for him tho, either now or when with Celtic, but there you go.

Wanyama had a year left on his contract. Southampton paid ?10 million for him so they've made a ?1 million loss on his sale. I think that represents very good business for Spurs and he'll fit straight into the team alongside Eric Dier if we want to play with two holding midfielders or with one. We'll certainly need him for our European adventure. Now, if we could just get a couple of top class strikers as back up or to play alongside Harry Kane I'll be very happy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't need you to tell me to 'fight against' racism.  I know what it looks it like, thank you.  And China would be our enemy whether we were in Europe or not (and has been for a long time), so that's immaterial.  I remember covering an EDL march 12 years ago, when there was a Cons-Lib Dem coalition, so the idea that this is a new problem is rubbish. BUT Reform is doing an excellent job of galvanising a minority in reaction to smug liberals like you, who blame the electorate's collective ignorance for all the country's demons.  What right have you for a moral mandate? 
    • Both Labour and Conservatives can remove the threat of a Reform government by making making two major policy promises. And these are .......... (1) categorically state that they will take Britain out of the ECHR and (2) Undertake to remove any new small boat arrivals to Rwanda or wherever else. Reform is basically a single issue party and adopting (1) & (2) would send Reform into obscurity. The country has had enough of our judiciary making a gold-plated interpretation of the ECHR statutes.  
    • You fight against by not pretending. By calling it what it is. Instead of slyly pretending they are not racist “actually”  recognise what the country is facing and say “no” why do you even need to ask the question?
    • How does one 'fight against...'?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...