Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ooh, while I'm here. 7,400.

>

>

> Disallowed and yellow card - you can't set up your

> own 100 as any pro knows.


Tch! I was unaware of any rules. Consider my wrist slapped.

We've all become a bit blas? about manager's and player's comings and goings, but this gave me a real WTF moment from the BBC's european round-up feature...


There are reports that Paris St-Germain boss Unai Emery could face the sack after six months and be replaced by former Manchester United manager Louis van Gaal.


WTF!...:)

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > BFS is a shoe in I reckon!

>

> I reckon Palace moved to get him before some other

> relegation threatened team did. Either that or

> Real Madrid.


Bobs not going anywhere ;)

There doesn't appear to be a standout candidate. IMO Giggs would be a massive risk, he's never played in a relegation dog fight yet alone been a manager in one. I would go for Gary Rowett, recently sacked by Brum for no other reason than they wanted a high profile name like Zola, even though he's been a poor manager up to now. Rowett fits the previous Swansea model of a young progressive manager, trying to play attractive football. If they go down, which I think they will, he will also have the experience of managing in the Championship...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There doesn't appear to be a standout candidate.

> IMO Giggs would be a massive risk, he's never

> played in a relegation dog fight yet alone been a

> manager in one. I would go for Gary Rowett,

> recently sacked by Brum for no other reason than

> they wanted a high profile name like Zola, even

> though he's been a poor manager up to now. Rowett

> fits the previous Swansea model of a young

> progressive manager, trying to play attractive

> football. If they go down, which I think they

> will, he will also have the experience of managing

> in the Championship...


Quite a few of the fans agree. Staying up now would be a bonus

(Hartson said 9 wins out of 20)

Officially better than Scholes, Gerrard and Lampard. Sort of.


After 50 top flight matches:

? Dele Alli: 16 goals, 10 assists

? Paul Scholes: 16 goals, 3 assists

? Steven Gerrard: 2 goals, 3 assists

? Frank Lampard: 5 goals, 2 assists



And he does this for laughs.


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...