Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Last year I think I predicted Arsenal which shows what I know. So here goes.


Man U

Arsenal

Man C

Spurs


Relegation


Huddersfield

Watford

Brighton


Promoted


Preston

Fulham

Villa


ETA I was going to select for relegation, Spurs, Liverpool and West Ham but that was only because no one would disagree with me......

  • 2 weeks later...

Other way round I think AM. They lost 5-0 in the first leg away from home (Artmedia Brataslava I think), and then failed to claw that back in the home leg.


It was Strachan's first month or so in charge, so as Rogers' second season there is "no" chance of that happening now. We are a well oiled machine.


Interestingly, Strachan's second season he got through the groups and into the last 16, losing to AC Milan by a single goal, Milan then lost to Liverpool in "that" final.

The Gospel according to David Moyes, aka ''It had nothing to do with me Guv''...


I think Harry Redknapp got it right when he said Antonio Conte couldn?t have kept up Sunderland last season.

Look at Manchester United. It?s taken them a few hundred million to get them in a good order.

At Real Sociedad, we kept them up, we did the job we had to do there.

The only one that looks a little bit out of sync is Sunderland. And it was probably the hardest to take. I think my record of losing two games in a row was minimal.

  • 2 weeks later...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mourihno wanted to sign him last year. Would be a

> great coup for Swansea, but maybe shouldn't be

> that surprised given the Clement/Ancelotti

> friendship...


Still getting used to the pace of the Premier League - but IMHO he will.


Mind - nobody was doing anything except defend against Spurs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...