Jump to content

Football Focus

Otta

By Otta
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I say man utd will no away win the league

>

> Red devil says he's glad I say that

>

> One of us is less secure in their convictions

> today

>

> Plus.. Yknow... Hamstring


You reckon?

Thigh strain actually.

In case you're wondering, your team won today...

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

I reckoned Blue had been banned or something. Talk about coming out of the closet! I still wonder if United had the chance to buy Ozil, why the hell they didn't. This league is full of incomplete teams for want of a better expression. City today looked good but will they keep it up? I still think it's the most open PL for years in terms of the number of teams who could do it. I include Liverpool in that.

One thing that concerns me is why Jonny Evans hasn't been given a game this season. He has developed into an excellent defender. Why has Rio played 6 games on the trot?

StraferJack

StraferJack

Posted
Posted

Good points Alan


Red devil. Not sure why you are coming across as a Manc parkdrive


The other day I took a neutral time to suggest your team had no chance of winning the title. You responded dismissively


If you want to suggest my team are equally unlikely then I will happily concur. But it would be nice if you didn't respond to criticism of man utd with knockbacks at other teams or their supporters. Because then it makes you look like... Well... A Manc parkdrive

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The other day I took a neutral time to suggest

> your team had no chance of winning the title. You

> responded dismissively


So when you diagree with something it's neutral, a mere suggestion.

When I do it, it's dismissive. Right.

Must be great living in your world.



> If you want to suggest my team are equally

> unlikely then I will happily concur. But it would

> be nice if you didn't respond to criticism of man

> utd with knockbacks at other teams or their

> supporters. Because then it makes you look

> like... Well... A Manc parkdrive


How I respond to other posts is none of your business. Delusions of grandeur from SJ, suerly not.

The fact that you posted a gloating comment around the time City's fourth goal went in, shows you're far more akin to PD in nature then I'll ever be...

StraferJack

StraferJack

Posted
Posted

I said a neutral time, not a neutral comment


My post the other day wasn't timed to pour salt on an open wound


Your response definitely contributed to the timing of any comment today tho


But again, I don't mind a small amount of schadenfreude between fans. Some of that is oil on the wheels. I don't recall any bad blood between us?


But telling someone involved in a direct conversation with you that your comments to that person are "none of their business" seems a bit off, no?

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> My post the other day wasn't timed to pour salt on

> an open wound


> Your response definitely contributed to the

> timing of any comment today tho


What is this 'open wound' you speak of? The only one who appears to have an open wound is you SJ, and as it became clear today, a festering one at that.



> But telling someone involved in a direct

> conversation with you that your comments to that

> person are "none of their business" seems a bit

> off, no?


I didn't say that your comments to me are none of your business.

I said it's none of your business how I respond to posts, your's or anybody else's...

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> .

> >

> > Good to see Arsenal top though. Enjoy.

>

> Oh no it isn't.



I know - couple of glasses of wine and I'll compliment anyone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Cyclemonkey
      GALA 2026

      By Cyclemonkey · Posted

      "Mysterious owners" 😆  If only there was a powerful search engine at our fingertips to find out such deep secrets.        
    • fishboy
      GALA 2026

      By fishboy · Posted

      It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
    • first mate
      GALA 2026

      By first mate · Posted

      Thanks for that. Maybe forthcoming elections have stymied the 7 day request? If Labour get back in, do we think GALA will try with greater success in 2027?
    • fishboy
      GALA 2026

      By fishboy · Posted

      Better late than never, same obscure reason as previously for not going ahead with the extended plan... "Due to commercial reasons, the event organisers have withdrawn their application to hold a 7- day event over two weekends. The application has been revised to request the use of Peckham Rye Park to hold a 4-day event over one bank holiday weekend with the following schedule: • Onsite: Monday 11 May 2026 • GALA: Friday 22 – Sunday 24 May • On the Rye Festival: BH Monday 25 May • Off-site Sunday 31 May 2026 This is the same event programme that was delivered in 2025."  GALA 2026 consultation findings report 1519.pdf

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...