Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Genuinely impressive stat on commentary saying

> Suarez has scored more by Christmas than any

> player in LFC history. That's after missing the

> start of the season, and early in today's match.


So what happens when he gets banned again or injured. Liverpool screwed? Just saying.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PD, yeah probably, I'm not suggesting Liverpool

> would be where they are without Saurez.

>

> I just pointed out an impressive stat that I heard

> on the radio is all.


I wasn't having a go, it's exactly the sort of crap that so called professional pundits continually ask about Giroud at Arsenal, conveniently forgetting that Ramsey, Ozil, Walcott, Mertersacker et al have all pitched in with goals, but still they presist.

He doesn't need to spend anything. We've done that already. I think he'll give youth a chance. The Bentalab lad who came on against Southampton looked very assured and confident, is a good example. I don't want us wasting anymore money. I'd like to see Tom Carroll back from his loan spell at QPR, he has a good eye for a pass. You won't see him being overly cautious and playing two holding midfielders home or away. I think we'll be much for cavalier in our attitude so we can expect some high scoring entertaining games where we'll concede plenty but hopefully score more than the opposition. Good luck to him. COYS!

I wish him well, and it does look like he'll set teams up to go for it, which can only be good in terms of excitement. Big gamble though, and Levy's expectations will still be high.


I think they'll get rid of him in the summer anyway, once a couple of international coaches are done with the world cup.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...