Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Former West Ham defender Julian Dicks on BBC Radio 5 live:


"Man City are a great side but the least you expect from your players as a supporter is to work hard and give 100%.


"It costs supporters a fortune to go to Manchester City and it was a case of players not giving a flying monkeys how they performed. The work rate over the last half a dozen games has been disgraceful


"We all have bad games and make mistakes but what you expect every single game is to give 100%. To watch some of them play is embarrassing.


"I cannot see a way how Sam Allardyce can continue, they got beat 5-0 by Forest and 6-0 at City and I can understand how the fans feel. The football is not good."

BFS said pre Forest that he was concentrating on todays game, earlier today, so I have been told, he allegedly said was going to Etihad with a 10 man defence. Negredo in his post match interview said it is difficult when you are up against pure defence. Probably why only 6 of MCFCs 30 something chances only went in. Feel sorry for travelling fans in that scenario, been there, seen that and saw us beaten at York away in 3rd Division !!!
The reports from neutral pundits re pretty scathing and that fat fooker is still towing his normal excuse making sh1te I genuinely don,t care if we go down or not as long as he goes. Hopefully tomorrow....but not holding my breath. I don,t want to support a team with him in charge and I think the majority of our fans now feel that too. Losing to city is no disgrace but like that is, especially after the forest game.

I don't know what to say and quite frankly I'm at the point of not caring. The whole situation at WHUFC makes me feel unclean, from the odious porn twats to the most unimaginative, egotistical prick ever to visit Upton Park.


I want my brilliant, comical, wonderful club back.

I'm pretty sure I heard in the Sunderland v Man Utd commentary that United hadn't had a penalty given against them in the Premiership in 77 games.


Anyway, West Ham look doomed. No fight whatsoever and BFS is clueless. I can empathise as Spurs Went through a similar period recently with AVB who turned out to be a negative one trick pony.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You have done it now RD.....

>

>

> I too am a little surprised by the hammers fans

> but it takes me back to when Celtic had Tony

> Mowbray and generally I feel the club's own fans

> can see what others cant, they see the decline

> before the neutrals and they know that no good

> will come of it.

>

> I trust what maxxi and quids are saying.

>

> I remember Celtic 0-4 St Mirren like it was

> yesterday. I knew he would be gone in the morning

> and sure enough a new opportunity.



As above. BFS gone in the morning surely.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive wrote:

>

> "And strangley when the likes of Jah or Blue

> Revolution take the piss, he goes very quiet.

> Strange that."

>

> I think difference is we do it as a light hearted

> jest and you do it out of spite and hatred.


You're entitled to your opinion but you are wrong.My dig is no differnt to yours in my view and if RD takes it personally that's his prerogative. We all take the opportunity to enjoy poor results or performance of opposing teams and if that upsets RD, too bad

'bout now Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The one plus for me is the corner we won with our fans

> celebrating like we'd won the world cup, fecking

> funny and highly ominous for BFS.

>

> Well it better be.


That was very funny, gallows humour at it's best.

At the time of writing BFS is still manager, I reckon the Board will wait until the Cardiff match, and see what kind of performance is put in then. Is Carroll back then? Heard he looks like Jesus...come to save the day

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...