Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good post Otta. Spot on.

>

> Anyway, watching the England match tonight and

> they're playing like a bunch of strangers. Rooney

> in particular is showing how "world class" he is -

> i.e = rubbish.



Agreed

I think it was this post


"Chuckle? you've made me fall about. Behave, you're not exactly snow white, and we're taking racial hatred here, or are you missing the point on purpose?"


I admit my jaw dropped when I read it as the comma, strictly speaking, means the clauses "you're not exactly snow white, and we're taking racial hatred here" are related.

Then I realised that's not what he meant, but instead of trying to make that clear as usual PD just upped the confrontational ante.


I guess what he meant was


"Chuckle? you've made me fall about. Behave, you're not exactly snow white, and we're taking racial hatred here [not club rivalry], or are you missing the point on purpose?"


But of course the point was that club rivalry was exactly what we were talking about, we had moved on from racism to players moving to rival clubs and club hatred.


Anyway, I'll take silence as an implicit apology to quids that what he wrote was easily inferred as an accusation of racism even if it wasn't (and i really don't think it was) implied.


Oh and imply vs infer

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it was this post

>

> "Chuckle? you've made me fall about. Behave,

> you're not exactly snow white, and we're taking

> racial hatred here, or are you missing the point

> on purpose?"

>

> I admit my jaw dropped when I read it as the

> comma, strictly speaking, means the clauses

> "you're not exactly snow white, and we're taking

> racial hatred here" are related.

> Then I realised that's not what he meant, but

> instead of trying to make that clear as usual PD

> just upped the confrontational ante.

>

> I guess what he meant was

>

> "Chuckle? you've made me fall about. Behave,

> you're not exactly snow white, and we're taking

> racial hatred here , or are you missing the point

> on purpose?"

>

> But of course the point was that club rivalry was

> exactly what we were talking about, we had moved

> on from racism to players moving to rival clubs

> and club hatred.

>

> Anyway, I'll take silence as an implicit apology

> to quids that what he wrote was easily inferred as

> an accusation of racism even if it wasn't (and i

> really don't think it was) implied.

>

> Oh and imply vs infer


Apologise for what exactly? I've not accussed him of anything. He stated that I was rude, etc and then says I'm, a "K*nt". So my point is that he was not as pure as the driven snow, snow white as in he has been guilty of the things he accuses me of. Clearly you are reading something into my posts which aren't there.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good post Otta. Spot on.

>

> Anyway, watching the England match tonight and

> they're playing like a bunch of strangers. Rooney

> in particular is showing how "world class" he is -

> i.e = rubbish.


That's because they are in a playing sense. The top sides tend to pick themselves, with England you get the feeling that Roy still doesn't know his best side, and could perm any 11 from about 18. At least there were two positives from last night, Sterling and Lallana...

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If I'd have written that and saw how it could

> easily be read as accusing someone of being racist

> I most definitely would have followed it up with

>

> "that reads like x, apologies, it certainly wasn't

> intended that way"

>

> The rest of your spat is your (plural) business.


Yet I've said many times that's isn't what I've accused him of, just his take on it. not sure what else I can add.

"Yet I've said many times that's isn't what I've accused him of, just his take on it. not sure what else I can add."


Indeed you did,. but you denied any culpability as if it had come out of thin air.


You have to remember, imply and infer are about interpretation. If the writing is ambiguous and everyone else sees a clear inference, then it doesn't matter the intention of the writer. I believe libel laws can hang on such things.


Sally Bercow used the 'i didn't mean that guv' defence and lost.

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> apparently Arsenal fans are trying to lodge a

> complaint against Agger and Liverpool that

> Wilshere was "done on purpose, knobbled to stop

> our chance" Behave !!

> Oh by the way, my ickle citeh won some shitty

> shiny trophy on Sunday !!!

>

> NO HISTORY !!


Fans have not lodged a complaint, the club want compensation for the injury from the FA, which is fair enough.

OK, rather overdoing it, especially suggesting picking a striker who isn't even match fit, and Downing has his haters, but Noble, there's truth in them thar hills

http://metro.co.uk/2014/03/06/why-roy-hodgson-must-start-picking-west-ham-stars-like-andy-carroll-stewart-downing-and-mark-noble-for-englands-world-cup-2014-squad-4444228/

Noble is dogged, determined, a good tackler and passer, good awareness and positioning, and can occasionally boot the ball well.

He's far from a star player and maybe not a game changer, but he's effective and personifies the spirit the national team utterly lacks right now.

Given the dearth of talent and the insipid displays so called great players have shown in recent years, give me a Noble in the squad any day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...