Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bottom line is, a man of fairness would have

> realised why his actions might have led others to

> misinterpret and would have had the grace to

> apologise and see where events went from there


Perhaps, but equally a man who has decided incorrectly that he has been accused of something would be big enough to realise that and move on, no?

I think he did move on


but pointing out that today you are posting overly-aggressive posts on multiple threads on a lovely spring day is unrelated to the previous incident


But again, instead of taking a breath and going "am I?" you barely pause before saying "am I fook!" and plough on regardless


just chill a bit is all people are saying

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think he did move on

>

> but pointing out that today you are posting

> overly-aggressive posts on multiple threads on a

> lovely spring day is unrelated to the previous

> incident

>

> But again, instead of taking a breath and going

> "am I?" you barely pause before saying "am I

> fook!" and plough on regardless

>

> just chill a bit is all people are saying



By calling me names he's moved on? Ok right. Clearly I'm the one who needs to chill

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> given you have been banned MULTIPLE times from the

> forum in the past, the name calling may not be

> grown-up but it has basis in truth

>

> Why don't you try and show him to be wrong instead

> of acting like a 12 year old


If you must know I sent him a polite PM asking to lay off the name calling nad he said that I hadn't apologised, again I've not accused the man of anything, and that I had spoilt his enjoyment of the forum and "to do one". Don't say I didn'y at least try.

over the years I have had my share of run ins with our quids - and one thing I've learned is that if he believes he is being accused of racism it aggravates him mightily


I remember one thread where he deemed something I wrote to be accusatory along those lines - and when I reread it I saw why. And publicy apologised to him on the forum. Job done. Line drawn


leaving you and he aside - as a general rule, if it kicks off publicly on a thread between people, then I think amends have to be public as well. Otherwise yer average reader is going to have a different impression of what went down

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If you've got a problem message me privately.

> You've accused me of calling you a racisr, which

> was bollocks, and then had the nerve to call me a

> K*nt.


Surely PD best just to apologise for what was perhaps a misunderstanding and move on?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > If you've got a problem message me privately.

> > You've accused me of calling you a racisr,

> which

> > was bollocks, and then had the nerve to call me

> a

> > K*nt.

>

> Surely PD best just to apologise for what was

> perhaps a misunderstanding and move on?


In order to set matters, hopefully, right I apologise to ???? for the incident. I certainly wasn't referring to him as a racist, nor was I trying to offend him. Not sure what else I can say.

I missed last nights match, but all the comments I was reading on the beeb basically said Arsenal had 10 men fighting bravely, and they had Ozil.


He has undoubted quality, and I know you didn't buy him to stick his boot in, but you must be a bit concerned about his apparent lack of interest or fight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes they do, but that is not the core tenet of representative democracy. At that level, we are voting for a parliamentary representative, irregardless of whether parties exist or not. It's why candidates can stand as independents. 
    • Sadly I think you will never convince people like this. They think gardens have to be kept chopped back and controlled. My theory is that this comes from being (or trying to be) controlling in every aspect of their lives, so I doubt if anything you could say or show them would have any effect. But are they actually coming into your garden or leaning over into it and pulling up/damaging things? If so, maybe one of our community police people could have a word with them?
    • Dear Nature lovers - advice please. I am being harassed by a neighbour who doesn't like my standard of gardening which she calls 'messy'. (I have rewilded my garden with advice from the London Wildlife Trust and a gardening expert from The Times.) I have twice caught this neighbour and her husband pulling up my plants and damaging my trees. Plus she has photographed my house, and sent a dozen complaints to the Dulwich Estate about my plan to rewild the verge outside my property - approved by the Estate some 4 years ago in line with their stated policy of supporting biodiversity in and around Dulwich. What can I do to introduce these neighbours  to the benefits to us all of returning a portion of our gardens to nature?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...