Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bottom line is, a man of fairness would have

> realised why his actions might have led others to

> misinterpret and would have had the grace to

> apologise and see where events went from there


Perhaps, but equally a man who has decided incorrectly that he has been accused of something would be big enough to realise that and move on, no?

I think he did move on


but pointing out that today you are posting overly-aggressive posts on multiple threads on a lovely spring day is unrelated to the previous incident


But again, instead of taking a breath and going "am I?" you barely pause before saying "am I fook!" and plough on regardless


just chill a bit is all people are saying

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think he did move on

>

> but pointing out that today you are posting

> overly-aggressive posts on multiple threads on a

> lovely spring day is unrelated to the previous

> incident

>

> But again, instead of taking a breath and going

> "am I?" you barely pause before saying "am I

> fook!" and plough on regardless

>

> just chill a bit is all people are saying



By calling me names he's moved on? Ok right. Clearly I'm the one who needs to chill

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> given you have been banned MULTIPLE times from the

> forum in the past, the name calling may not be

> grown-up but it has basis in truth

>

> Why don't you try and show him to be wrong instead

> of acting like a 12 year old


If you must know I sent him a polite PM asking to lay off the name calling nad he said that I hadn't apologised, again I've not accused the man of anything, and that I had spoilt his enjoyment of the forum and "to do one". Don't say I didn'y at least try.

over the years I have had my share of run ins with our quids - and one thing I've learned is that if he believes he is being accused of racism it aggravates him mightily


I remember one thread where he deemed something I wrote to be accusatory along those lines - and when I reread it I saw why. And publicy apologised to him on the forum. Job done. Line drawn


leaving you and he aside - as a general rule, if it kicks off publicly on a thread between people, then I think amends have to be public as well. Otherwise yer average reader is going to have a different impression of what went down

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If you've got a problem message me privately.

> You've accused me of calling you a racisr, which

> was bollocks, and then had the nerve to call me a

> K*nt.


Surely PD best just to apologise for what was perhaps a misunderstanding and move on?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > If you've got a problem message me privately.

> > You've accused me of calling you a racisr,

> which

> > was bollocks, and then had the nerve to call me

> a

> > K*nt.

>

> Surely PD best just to apologise for what was

> perhaps a misunderstanding and move on?


In order to set matters, hopefully, right I apologise to ???? for the incident. I certainly wasn't referring to him as a racist, nor was I trying to offend him. Not sure what else I can say.

I missed last nights match, but all the comments I was reading on the beeb basically said Arsenal had 10 men fighting bravely, and they had Ozil.


He has undoubted quality, and I know you didn't buy him to stick his boot in, but you must be a bit concerned about his apparent lack of interest or fight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...