Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just looked at a couple of "as it happened" reports, both of which say that the silence was well respected at the time. However, one of them later mentions reports that there was some faint singing, possibly by fans not yet out on the stands.


I dunno. The vast majority of Chelsea fans are just footy fans like any other, but they do seem to have a small number of comlete and utter cunts supporting them. And one captaining them.

Liverpool's performance on Sunday.....


Thought overall impressive but when it went to 2-2 I thought there was only going to be one winner and thought a number of Liverpool players went missing, especially Suarez who thought at 2-2 that the only way to win an important game was by fooling the referee into penalties/free kicks he didn't deserve, and clearly lost his composure by being regularly caught offside. The winner was a bit of an opportunistic effort, brilliantly taken.


Liverpool of course won't mind one bit how they got the points, any win against MC is fantastic, but they do seem to freeze a bit when teams come back at them.


My worry is that, assuming they beat Norwich??, that against Chelsea, they wont be able to establish that early lead, Chelsea being what they are.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Liverpool's performance on Sunday.....

>

> Thought overall impressive but when it went to 2-2

> I thought there was only going to be one winner

> and thought a number of Liverpool players went

> missing, especially Suarez who thought at 2-2 that

> the only way to win an important game was by

> fooling the referee into penalties/free kicks he

> didn't deserve, and clearly lost his composure by

> being regularly caught offside. The winner was a

> bit of an opportunistic effort, brilliantly

> taken.

>

> Liverpool of course won't mind one bit how they

> got the points, any win against MC is fantastic,

> but they do seem to freeze a bit when teams come

> back at them.

>

> My worry is that, assuming they beat Norwich??,

> that against Chelsea, they wont be able to

> establish that early lead, Chelsea being what they

> are.



Considering that Liverpool have won ten PL games in a row and that Chelsea's away form is patchy- i think Liverpool are strong favourites for that game and for the League title now. Plus Chelsea have the small matter of a two legs of a CL semifinal either side of the game.

That could well be the key. I hope Chelsea do quite well in the first leg, not so well that they feel it's won, but well enough that they're still in it, and maybe have that in their minds when they come to Anfied.


I then obviously hope they lose to Liverpool before getting buried in the second CL leg.


Neither Sturridge nor Suarez were great on Sunday, which for me shows what a good team performance it was.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



>

> I then obviously hope they lose to Liverpool

> before getting buried in the second CL leg.


That the ideal scenario


>

> Neither Sturridge nor Suarez were great on Sunday,

> which for me shows what a good team performance it

> was.


That's a glass half full approach.

And why not? Whatever will be will be now, not point being negative.


Agree with RD though, think Chelsea will be a harder proposition for Liverpool. City was always going to be a very difficult match which we could have lost, but it was always going to be like to boxers going toe to toe and throwing bombs. Chelsea will be much cagier and try to knock us out with counter punches.


As I say, whatever will be will be, but I pray we beat them, just to wipe the smug look off of Jose's face.

"but I pray we beat them, just to wipe the smug look off of Jose's face."


ah I remember last time I feltthat way


1000 games in charge for Wenger - surely THIS was the moment to ... awwww bugger


but I am so hoping Liverpool do it - and am booking time in the pub for that game. Everywhere will be heaving I expect

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As it turned out after my post, the police have photos. And even if they didn't, the OP reported the incident to the police, who would have asked for a description.  However there are all sorts of problems with eye witness descriptions, which would just be multiplied with several kids involved. I stand by my post. Are you suggesting a full description of these kids should be posted on here so that ... what?  Vigilante action by forum members? And if there was mistaken identity? Then what? Even if there wasn't, there could be all sorts of background issues relating to this sort of anti social behaviour. It should be left to the police to find and  appropriately deal with  the perpetrators of criminal behaviour. The police are far from perfect, but the alternative just makes a general slide into lawlessness more likely.
    • Hi there, we’re on Rodwell Road and need some large + medium moving boxes - please message if you’re trying to get rid of some, we can collect. 
    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...