Jump to content

Recommended Posts

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/tottenham

> -weigh-up-gamble-on-david-moyes-9281480.html

>

> Be surprised if it happened, as he gambled with

> AVB after a bad spell with one club preceeded by a

> great spell with another.

>

> But,I'm sure if you looked back at most big

> manager's histories there would be a dodgy spell

> that they moved on from and got stronger. So i

> think it's a bit early to say that Moyes is doomed

> to fail in the rest of his career just because he

> couldn't follow in the footsteps of the greatest

> manager this country, possibly the world, has ever

> seen.

>

> The pressure on Moyes to succeed at United was

> horrendous, especially after being handpicked by

> Ferguson. There'd still be pressure on him if he

> came to Spurs, but a different kind. He'd have

> pressure to succeed where others have failed- a

> better kind of pressure I reckon.

>

> I'd call it as not a bad option.


A lot of people said, even before Fergie retired, that the time to be Utd's manager was after the first one.

If I was a Spurs fan I would be worried about his general nagative demeanour and playing style, Spurs like Utd have an attacking tradition. Noises coming from OT is that he was more concerned about how to stop the opposition than Utd going forward. He was a defender as a player, I think it's just the way he is and he won't change.

I can see him going abroad to get out of the limelight like Steve Maclaren did, or maybe Celtic if Lennon moves south...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> A lot of people said, even before Fergie retired,

> that the time to be Utd's manager was after the

> first one.

> If I was a Spurs fan I would be worried about his

> general nagative demeanour and playing style,

> Spurs like Utd have an attacking tradition. Noises

> coming from OT is that he was more concerned about

> how to stop the opposition than Utd going forward.

> He was a defender as a player, I think it's just

> the way he is and he won't change.

> I can see him going abroad to get out of the

> limelight like Steve Maclaren did, or maybe Celtic

> if Lennon moves south...


Celtic have an attacking tradition too - so no thanks.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What happened to Van Gaal going to Spuds?

>

>

> you heard that Moyes got sacked yeah?


No really, well I never did, you're so well up on these things aren't you? So back to the question then. Van Gaal was never likely to go to Spuds while he had a hole in his arse is the most likely response.

Rafa plays boring football and doesn't change things (especially not in a positive way) when things need changing. I know he's much loved at Liverpool, and I think he's a good man, but his footy didn't do much for me.


Yes the champs league win was incredibly exciting, but he can hardly be credited with masterminding a second half come back from being 3-0 down.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't really see why they're insisting on

> experience at the top level. Giggs knows the club

> better than most, don't see why they don't just give him a go.


The same could be said of Tim Sherwood at Spurs. A clueless twonk in my opinion. Good luck to Giggs though.


He may not be the chosen one but he is the one who chooses to shag his brother's wife.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't really see why they're insisting on

> > experience at the top level. Giggs knows the

> club

> > better than most, don't see why they don't just

> give him a go.

>

> The same could be said of Tim Sherwood at Spurs. A

> clueless twonk in my opinion. Good luck to Giggs

> though.

>

> He may not be the chosen one but he is the one who

> chooses to shag his brother's wife.



Giggs has two important advantages over Sherwood- been at the club all his life and would have the respect of everyone. Guardiola anyone?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...